From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/26] KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 19:43:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209589@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111180922.4177927-4-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] KVM: x86: race clearing matched TSC state in
kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate()
--
commit 0772c4b5400b34e15b8efeba1e351501ea33af4a
Author: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool
This commit replaces read-time comparisons of nr_vcpus_matched_tsc against
online_vcpus with a boolean all_vcpus_matched_tsc maintained under
tsc_write_lock, initializing it to true at VM creation and clearing it in
kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate() before synchronizing the new vCPU.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 12f465040efc2..1bb0136042a65 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -9584,8 +9589,38 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex))
> + struct kvm_arch *ka = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * The new vCPU is already counted in online_vcpus but has not
> + * been synchronized. Clear the cached matched state before
> + * trying the mutex: the old read-time comparison failed
> + * conservatively false throughout this window, and userspace
> + * can hold it open across a whole first KVM_RUN by taking
> + * vcpu->mutex before we do. The synchronization below (or any
> + * racing host-initiated TSC write on the already-live fd)
> + * re-latches the flags. A protected guest TSC never
> + * participates in offset matching, so for it there is nothing
> + * to clear — and no later sync to re-latch.
> + */
> + if (!vcpu->arch.guest_tsc_protected) {
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->tsc_write_lock, flags);
> + WRITE_ONCE(ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc, false);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->tsc_write_lock, flags);
> + }
> +
> + if (mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex)) {
> + /*
> + * Aborted by a fatal signal: the synchronization never
> + * ran. Propagate whatever the matched state now is (a
> + * racing TSC write may have re-latched it), so the
> + * master clock does not stay in its previous mode with
> + * running siblings keeping PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT.
> + */
> + kvm_update_masterclock(vcpu->kvm);
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Can clearing ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc here race with vCPU ioctls on the
newly created fd, or leave ka->use_master_clock stale while waiting for
vcpu->mutex?
In kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(), create_vcpu_fd(), atomic_inc(&kvm->online_vcpus),
and mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex) all run before kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate():
CPU0 CPU1
kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu()
create_vcpu_fd(vcpu)
atomic_inc(&kvm->online_vcpus)
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex)
kvm_vcpu_ioctl(KVM_SET_MSRS)
mutex_lock(&vcpu->mutex)
...
__kvm_synchronize_tsc()
ka->nr_vcpus_matched_tsc++
vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation =
ka->cur_tsc_generation
ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc = true
kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ka->tsc_write_lock)
WRITE_ONCE(ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc, false) <-- clobbers matched state
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ka->tsc_write_lock)
mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex) <-- aborted by fatal signal
kvm_update_masterclock() <-- disables masterclock permanently
Because vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation already matches
ka->cur_tsc_generation after CPU1's write, even if mutex_lock_killable()
succeeds, a subsequent matching sync in postcreate will not increment
nr_vcpus_matched_tsc again (and in the later commit "KVM: x86: Allow KVM
master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other", a non-matching
offset write on CPU1 followed by the clear on CPU0 leaves
ka->all_vcpus_matched_freq false).
Additionally, when another thread takes vcpu->mutex for KVM_RUN before
postcreate does, clearing ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc without calling
kvm_update_masterclock() leaves ka->use_master_clock true across that
entire first KVM_RUN (and even if CPU1 runs kvm_guest_time_update() before
CPU0 acquires tsc_write_lock, both ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc and
ka->use_master_clock are still true).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111180922.4177927-1-dwmw2@infradead.org?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 18:08 [PATCH v13 00/26] KVM: x86: Cleaning up the KVM clock mess, part 2 David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:08 ` [PATCH v13 01/26] KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in kvm_synchronize_tsc() David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:08 ` [PATCH v13 02/26] KVM: x86: Kill last_tsc_{nsec,write,offset} fields David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:08 ` [PATCH v13 03/26] KVM: x86: Replace nr_vcpus_matched_tsc count with all_vcpus_matched_tsc bool David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 19:43 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 04/26] KVM: x86: Allow KVM master clock mode when TSCs are offset from each other David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 05/26] KVM: x86: Factor out kvm_use_master_clock() David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 06/26] KVM: x86: Avoid gratuitous global clock updates David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 07/26] KVM: x86: Don't latch the Hyper-V TSC page from a superseded snapshot David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 08/26] KVM: x86: Avoid redundant masterclock updates from multiple vCPUs David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 09/26] KVM: x86: Stop TSC catchup when a frequency change no longer needs it David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 10/26] KVM: x86: Re-synchronize TSC after KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 21:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 11/26] KVM: x86: Cache host vclock_mode for masterclock eligibility checks David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 12/26] KVM: x86: Remove pvclock_gtod_data and private timekeeping code David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 13/26] KVM: x86: Keep the master clock trustworthy while the VM has no vCPUs David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 14/26] UAPI: x86: Move pvclock-abi to UAPI for x86 platforms David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 22:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 15/26] KVM: selftests: Use UAPI pvclock-abi.h in xen_shinfo_test David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 16/26] KVM: x86: Add KVM_[GS]ET_CLOCK_GUEST for accurate KVM clock migration David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 22:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 17/26] KVM: selftests: Add library helpers for clock and TSC-offset ioctls David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 18/26] KVM: x86: Add KVM_VCPU_TSC_SCALE and fix the documentation on TSC migration David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 19/26] KVM: selftests: Add KVM/PV clock selftest to prove timer correction David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 20/26] KVM: selftests: Add master clock offset test David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 21/26] KVM: selftests: Add Xen/generic CPUID timing leaf test David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 22/26] KVM: selftests: Add Xen runstate migration test David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 23/26] KVM: selftests: Test that the first user TSC write is honoured exactly David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 24/26] KVM: x86/xen: Drop open-coded fallback clock read in kvm_xen_start_timer() David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 25/26] KVM: x86: Use a single time snapshot in kvm_vm_ioctl_set_clock() David Woodhouse
2026-11-11 18:09 ` [PATCH v13 26/26] KVM: x86: Keep master clock for guests using legacy MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209589@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox