From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:33:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100316130840.GA24808@elte.hu> <4B9FBA8B.8020200@codemonkey.ws> <20100316173940.GA23859@elte.hu> <4BA00F1F.1090907@codemonkey.ws> <20100317081041.GC16374@elte.hu> <4BA1E24B.6090904@redhat.com> <20100318085607.GB2157@elte.hu> <20100318101025.GA13073@elte.hu> <4BA1FEB0.7000400@redhat.com> <20100318113527.GA13168@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Alexander Graf , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Fr?d?ric Weisbecker To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100318113527.GA13168@elte.hu> (Ingo Molnar's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:35:27 +0100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar writes: > [...] > Distributions are very eager to update kernels even in stable periods of the > distro lifetime - they are much less willing to update user-space packages. > [...] Sorry, er, what? What distributions eagerly upgrade kernels in stable periods, were it not primarily motivated by security fixes? What users eagerly replace their kernels? - FChE