kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	aik@amd.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, vivek.kasireddy@intel.com,
	yilun.xu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lukas@wunner.de, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
	leon@kernel.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
	zhenzhong.duan@intel.com, tao1.su@intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, zhiw@nvidia.com,
	simona.vetter@ffwll.ch, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, kevin.tian@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/30] iommufd/device: Add TSM Bind/Unbind for TIO support
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:10:43 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5aplfj99x0.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603122149.GH376789@nvidia.com>

Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:20:51PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
>> > Wouldn’t it be simpler to skip the reference count increment altogether
>> > and just call tsm_unbind in the virtual device’s destroy callback?
>> > (iommufd_vdevice_destroy())
>> 
>> The vdevice refcount is the main concern, there is also an IOMMU_DESTROY
>> ioctl. User could just free the vdevice instance if no refcount, while VFIO
>> is still in bound state. That seems not the correct free order.
>
> Freeing the vdevice should automatically unbind it..
>

One challenge I ran into during implementation was the dependency of
vfio on iommufd_device. When vfio needs to perform a tsm_unbind,
it only has access to an iommufd_device.

However, TSM operations like binding and unbinding are handled at the
iommufd_vdevice level. The issue? There’s no direct link from
iommufd_device back to iommufd_vdevice.

To address this, I modified the following structures:

modified   drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ struct iommufd_device {
 	/* protect iopf_enabled counter */
 	struct mutex iopf_lock;
 	unsigned int iopf_enabled;
+	struct iommufd_vdevice *vdev;
 };
 
 static inline struct iommufd_device *
@@ -613,6 +614,7 @@ struct iommufd_vdevice {
 	struct iommufd_object obj;
 	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
 	struct iommufd_viommu *viommu;
+	struct iommufd_device *idev;
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct mutex	mutex;	/* mutex to synchronize updates to tsm_bound */
 	u64 id; /* per-vIOMMU virtual ID */

These fields are updated during tsm_bind and tsm_unbind, so they must be
protected by the appropriate locks:

Updating vdevice->idev requires holding vdev->mutex (vdev_lock).
Updating device->vdev requires idev->igroup->lock (idev_lock).

tsm_unbind in vdevice_destroy:

vdevice_destroy() ends up calling tsm_unbind() while holding only the
vdev_lock. At first glance, this seems unsafe. But in practice, it's
fine because the corresponding iommufd_device has already been destroyed
when the VFIO device file descriptor was closed—triggering
vfio_df_iommufd_unbind().

I’ve added an in-code comment to explain why tsm_unbind() is safe here
without acquiring the idev_lock. Hope that is ok.

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-29  5:34 [RFC PATCH 00/30] Host side (KVM/VFIO/IOMMUFD) support for TDISP using TSM Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] HACK: dma-buf: Introduce dma_buf_get_pfn_unlocked() kAPI Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] vfio: Export vfio device get and put registration helpers Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] vfio/pci: Share the core device pointer while invoking feature functions Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] fixup! vfio/pci: fix dma-buf revoke typo on reset Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] HACK: vfio/pci: Support get_pfn() callback for dma-buf Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 07/30] KVM: Support vfio_dmabuf backed MMIO region Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for vfio_dmabuf backed MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 10/30] vfio/pci: Export vfio dma-buf specific info for importers Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:30   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-03  5:01     ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 11/30] KVM: vfio_dmabuf: Fetch VFIO specific dma-buf data for sanity check Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 12/30] iommufd/device: Associate a kvm pointer to iommufd_device Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 13/30] fixup! iommufd/selftest: Sync iommufd_device_bind() change to selftest Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 14/30] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Pass in kvm pointer to viommu_alloc Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 15/30] fixup: iommu/selftest: Sync .viommu_alloc() change to selftest Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:34 ` [RFC PATCH 16/30] iommufd/viommu: track the kvm pointer & its refcount in viommu core Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 17/30] iommufd/device: Add TSM Bind/Unbind for TIO support Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 12:43   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-03  6:20     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-03 12:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-04  8:40         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2025-06-04 13:24           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06  7:59             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 18/30] iommufd/viommu: Add trusted IOMMU configuration handlers for vdev Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 19/30] vfio/pci: Add TSM TDI bind/unbind IOCTLs for TEE-IO support Xu Yilun
2025-06-01 10:45   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-02 14:43     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-04 13:37       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05  9:41         ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 15:09           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06  3:25             ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 16:09           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-16  8:16           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-18  4:54             ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-05 12:03   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05 15:10     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-05 16:17       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-05 16:33         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-06  4:26           ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-06  9:32           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-06 12:09             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 20/30] vfio/pci: Do TSM Unbind before zapping bars Xu Yilun
2025-06-02  5:20   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-02 13:56     ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 14:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-03  4:50     ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 21/30] iommufd/vdevice: Add TSM Guest request uAPI Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 22/30] fixup! PCI/TSM: Change the guest request type definition Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 23/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Introduce a "tdx" subsystem and "tsm" device Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 24/30] coco/tdx_tsm: TEE Security Manager driver for TDX Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 25/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Add connect()/disconnect() handlers prototype Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 26/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Add bind()/unbind()/guest_req() " Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 27/30] PCI/TSM: Add PCI driver callbacks to handle TSM requirements Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:06   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-06-03  5:52     ` Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 28/30] vfio/pci: Implement TSM handlers for MMIO Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 29/30] iommufd/vdevice: Implement TSM handlers for trusted DMA Xu Yilun
2025-05-29  5:35 ` [RFC PATCH 30/30] coco/tdx_tsm: Manage TDX Module enforced operation sequences for Unbind Xu Yilun
2025-06-02 13:37 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] Host side (KVM/VFIO/IOMMUFD) support for TDISP using TSM Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-20  4:21   ` Xu Yilun
2025-06-11  1:55 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-06-21  1:07   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2025-06-25 10:45     ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-11 23:08       ` dan.j.williams
2025-07-15 11:09         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq5aplfj99x0.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tao1.su@intel.com \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).