Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] vfio: cache KVM VM file references instead of raw struct kvm pointers
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 13:41:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5ay0h6si8z.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525164753.E54191F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

sashiko-bot@kernel.org writes:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Concurrent BIND_IOMMUFD ioctls on multiple cdev file descriptors for the same device unconditionally overwrite device->kvm_file, leading to reference leaks and Use-After-Free.
> --
>
> commit 9a5907f1fb1069cc250703cfb404e5a7be33bf23
> Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
>
> vfio: cache KVM VM file references instead of raw struct kvm pointers
>
> This commit switches VFIO to track the VM's struct file instead of raw
> struct kvm pointers to manage the KVM VM lifetime. This change allows
> VFIO and iommufd to use normal file references for VM lifetime rather
> than relying on KVM's internal refcounting.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
>> index 54abf312cf049..ca75ab8eb7bd7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
>> -	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
>> -	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
>> -	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
>> +	 * Before the device open, get the VM struct file currently
>> +	 * associated with the device file (if there is one) and obtain a
>> +	 * reference. This reference is held until the device is closed.
>> +	 * Save the file in the device for use by drivers.
>>  	 */
>>  	vfio_df_get_kvm_safe(df);
>>  
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this unconditionally
> overwrite device->kvm_file if concurrent BIND_IOMMUFD ioctls are called on
> multiple cdev file descriptors for the same device?
>
> If a user opens a VFIO device cdev twice, getting two distinct file
> descriptors (df1 and df2) for the same device, and successfully binds df1
> to IOMMUFD:
>
> - device->kvm_file is set (with an extra refcount)
> - device->open_count increments to 1
>
> When the user attempts to bind df2, the check for df->access_granted only
> checks df2, so execution proceeds.
>
> Calling vfio_df_get_kvm_safe(df2) will overwrite device->kvm_file with
> df2's KVM file. Could the previous file reference from df1 be leaked because
> no fput() is called?
>
> If vfio_df_open(df2) then returns an error (because device->open_count is 1),
> the error path jumps to out_put_kvm and calls vfio_device_put_kvm(device).
> This drops the new reference and clears device->kvm_file to NULL.
>
> This leaves df1 bound and functional, but its KVM association is destroyed.
> When df1 is eventually closed, hardware drivers like vfio_pci_zdev that check
> vfio_device_get_kvm() will see a NULL pointer and skip their KVM
> unregistration hooks. Can this leave KVM hooked to a closed device,
> potentially leading to a use-after-free when KVM accesses it?
>

I guess we can fix this by

modified   drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
@@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ long vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 		return ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
-	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
-	if (df->access_granted) {
+	/* The cdev path only supports one bound/open device fd. */
+	if (df->access_granted || device->open_count) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}



  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-26  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 15:48 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add iommufd ioctls to support TSM operations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] vfio: cache KVM VM file references instead of raw struct kvm pointers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 16:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26  8:11     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-05-26 10:52   ` Anthony Krowiak
2026-05-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iommufd/device: Associate KVM file pointer with iommufd_device Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 20:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26  8:17     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iommufd/viommu: Keep a reference to the KVM file Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iommufd/tsm: add vdevice TSM bind/unbind ioctl Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 21:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-25 15:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] iommufd/vdevice: add TSM request ioctl Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-05-25 22:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-26  8:18     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27  0:16   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2026-05-27  6:17     ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-05-27  6:56       ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-27 12:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-27 15:34       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27 17:49         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27 22:49           ` Dan Williams (nvidia)
2026-06-02  5:10             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-06-02  8:40       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq5ay0h6si8z.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox