From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow to use KVM without in-kernel
 irqchip
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 15:50:06 +0300
Message-ID: <007901d0c7a1$99981f50$ccc85df0$@samsung.com>
References: <cover.1436874248.git.p.fedin@samsung.com>
 <55A93488.9060408@arm.com> <00df01d0c22b$fcaef0d0$f60cd270$@samsung.com>
 <55ACAC73.9090500@arm.com> <03d901d0c44e$beadaa90$3c08ffb0$@samsung.com>
 <55B11AEC.4050804@arm.com> <008f01d0c625$45d91a90$d18b4fb0$@samsung.com>
 <55B26277.80205@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-reply-to: <55B26277.80205@arm.com>
Content-language: ru
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: 'Marc Zyngier' <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, 'Eric Auger' <eric.auger@linaro.org>
List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu

 Hello!

> As I said before, not having a VGIC pretty much puts you in an uncharted
> territory, and the amount of hacks you have to introduce are not really
> worth the effort in mainline.

 And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just enable KVM without both vGIC and
vTimer, and that's all we do? It will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my
first patchset a very small bit in order to do this.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia