From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Fedin Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGICv3 save/restore API documentation Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:10:29 +0300 Message-ID: <00ec01d10269$f6c82af0$e45880d0$@samsung.com> References: <1444247430-14808-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> <00e601d10264$61cdafb0$25690f10$@samsung.com> <56177592.2080702@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2373D41F30 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVaFCVYTLC-7 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com (mailout3.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.13]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513D341457 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout3.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014)) with ESMTP id <0NVY00EMM1DIY280@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:10:30 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: <56177592.2080702@arm.com> Content-language: ru List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: 'Marc Zyngier' , 'Christoffer Dall' , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: 'Andre Przywara' , kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hello! > How do you reconcile the two? What's the point of trying to shoehorn a > different concept into the existing API? Keeping amount of #define's as small as possible, and try to reuse everything that can be reused. It's just my personal taste, nothing serious. :) The question was just a clarification. Ok, this is not a problem. By the way, i've just finished v5 patchset, now need to rewrite qemu and test before posting it. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia