From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Fedin
Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: Add VGICv3 save/restore API documentation
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:10:29 +0300
Message-ID: <00ec01d10269$f6c82af0$e45880d0$@samsung.com>
References: <1444247430-14808-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
<00e601d10264$61cdafb0$25690f10$@samsung.com> <56177592.2080702@arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2373D41F30
for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id lVaFCVYTLC-7 for ;
Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com (mailout3.w1.samsung.com
[210.118.77.13])
by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513D341457
for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 04:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245])
by mailout3.w1.samsung.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014))
with ESMTP id <0NVY00EMM1DIY280@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:10:30 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <56177592.2080702@arm.com>
Content-language: ru
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
To: 'Marc Zyngier' , 'Christoffer Dall' , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: 'Andre Przywara' , kvm@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Hello!
> How do you reconcile the two? What's the point of trying to shoehorn a
> different concept into the existing API?
Keeping amount of #define's as small as possible, and try to reuse everything that can be reused.
It's just my personal taste, nothing serious. :) The question was just a clarification. Ok, this is
not a problem. By the way, i've just finished v5 patchset, now need to rewrite qemu and test before
posting it.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia