From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: api: add kvm_irq_routing_extended_msi
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:33:17 +0300
Message-ID: <025301d0b7f0$5210a140$f631e3c0$@samsung.com>
References: <1435592237-17924-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
 <011f01d0b498$6a17aeb0$3e470c10$@samsung.com> <5596503E.6040902@arm.com>
 <00fd01d0b7b6$f6cf3550$e46d9ff0$@samsung.com> <559A3C9C.6050302@arm.com>
 <20150706093026.GA11590@cbox> <559A52E6.5050402@arm.com>
 <20150706103755.GC11590@cbox> <559A6164.1000401@redhat.com>
 <559A6527.1040107@arm.com> <20150706120837.GA13530@cbox>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD5057BC1
 for <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>; Mon,  6 Jul 2015 09:21:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id erwUpFI83kSA for <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>;
 Mon,  6 Jul 2015 09:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com (mailout2.w1.samsung.com
 [210.118.77.12])
 by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2BCF57BBE
 for <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>; Mon,  6 Jul 2015 09:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245])
 by mailout2.w1.samsung.com
 (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.31.0 64bit (built May 5 2014))
 with ESMTP id <0NR2006MPIZJ3S30@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for
 kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 14:33:19 +0100 (BST)
In-reply-to: <20150706120837.GA13530@cbox>
Content-language: ru
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/options/kvmarm>,
 <mailto:kvmarm-request@lists.cs.columbia.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm>
List-Post: <mailto:kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
List-Help: <mailto:kvmarm-request@lists.cs.columbia.edu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm>,
 <mailto:kvmarm-request@lists.cs.columbia.edu?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu
To: 'Christoffer Dall' <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, 'Andre Przywara' <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: eric.auger@st.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, 'Marc Zyngier' <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Paolo Bonzini' <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu

> Just so I'm sure I understand: The way the kernel differentiates between
> no-devid and devid==0, is whether or not the devid flag is set, correct?

 Yes, exactly.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia