From: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
To: <maz@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mcrossley@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:54:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1603711447-11998-2-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1603711447-11998-1-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com>
The Commit:6d674e28 introduces a notion to detect and handle the
device mapping. The commit checks for the VM_PFNMAP flag is set
in vma->flags and if set then marks force_pte to true such that
if force_pte is true then ignore the THP function check
(/transparent_hugepage_adjust()).
There could be an issue with the VM_PFNMAP flag setting and checking.
For example consider a case where the mdev vendor driver register's
the vma_fault handler named vma_mmio_fault(), which maps the
host MMIO region in-turn calls remap_pfn_range() and maps
the MMIO's vma space. Where, remap_pfn_range implicitly sets
the VM_PFNMAP flag into vma->flags.
Now lets assume a mmio fault handing flow where guest first access
the MMIO region whose 2nd stage translation is not present.
So that results to arm64-kvm hypervisor executing guest abort handler,
like below:
kvm_handle_guest_abort() -->
user_mem_abort()--> {
...
0. checks the vma->flags for the VM_PFNMAP.
1. Since VM_PFNMAP flag is not yet set so force_pte _is_ false;
2. gfn_to_pfn_prot() -->
__gfn_to_pfn_memslot() -->
fixup_user_fault() -->
handle_mm_fault()-->
__do_fault() -->
vma_mmio_fault() --> // vendor's mdev fault handler
remap_pfn_range()--> // Here sets the VM_PFNMAP
flag into vma->flags.
3. Now that force_pte is set to false in step-2),
will execute transparent_hugepage_adjust() func and
that lead to Oops [4].
}
The proposition is to set force_pte=true if kvm_is_device_pfn is true.
[4] THP Oops:
> pc: kvm_is_transparent_hugepage+0x18/0xb0
> ...
> ...
> user_mem_abort+0x340/0x9b8
> kvm_handle_guest_abort+0x248/0x468
> handle_exit+0x150/0x1b0
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x778
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3c0/0x858
> ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38
Tested on Huawei Kunpeng Taishan-200 arm64 server, Using VFIO-mdev device.
Linux-5.10-rc1 tip: 3650b228
Fixes: 6d674e28 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle faulting of device mappings")
Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
---
v2:
- Per Marc's suggestion - setting force_pte=true.
- Rebased and tested for 5.10-rc1 commit: 3650b228
v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/21/460
arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 19aacc7..d4cd253 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn)) {
device = true;
+ force_pte = true;
} else if (logging_active && !write_fault) {
/*
* Only actually map the page as writable if this was a write
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 11:24 [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: fix the mmio faulting Santosh Shukla
2020-10-26 11:24 ` Santosh Shukla [this message]
2020-10-27 4:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle " Gavin Shan
2020-10-29 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: fix " Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1603711447-11998-2-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com \
--to=sashukla@nvidia.com \
--cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mcrossley@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox