Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
To: <maz@kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: mcrossley@nvidia.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle the mmio faulting
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:54:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1603711447-11998-2-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1603711447-11998-1-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com>

The Commit:6d674e28 introduces a notion to detect and handle the
device mapping. The commit checks for the VM_PFNMAP flag is set
in vma->flags and if set then marks force_pte to true such that
if force_pte is true then ignore the THP function check
(/transparent_hugepage_adjust()).

There could be an issue with the VM_PFNMAP flag setting and checking.
For example consider a case where the mdev vendor driver register's
the vma_fault handler named vma_mmio_fault(), which maps the
host MMIO region in-turn calls remap_pfn_range() and maps
the MMIO's vma space. Where, remap_pfn_range implicitly sets
the VM_PFNMAP flag into vma->flags.

Now lets assume a mmio fault handing flow where guest first access
the MMIO region whose 2nd stage translation is not present.
So that results to arm64-kvm hypervisor executing guest abort handler,
like below:

kvm_handle_guest_abort() -->
 user_mem_abort()--> {

    ...
    0. checks the vma->flags for the VM_PFNMAP.
    1. Since VM_PFNMAP flag is not yet set so force_pte _is_ false;
    2. gfn_to_pfn_prot() -->
        __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() -->
            fixup_user_fault() -->
                handle_mm_fault()-->
                    __do_fault() -->
                       vma_mmio_fault() --> // vendor's mdev fault handler
                        remap_pfn_range()--> // Here sets the VM_PFNMAP
                                                flag into vma->flags.
    3. Now that force_pte is set to false in step-2),
       will execute transparent_hugepage_adjust() func and
       that lead to Oops [4].
 }

The proposition is to set force_pte=true if kvm_is_device_pfn is true.

[4] THP Oops:
> pc: kvm_is_transparent_hugepage+0x18/0xb0
> ...
> ...
> user_mem_abort+0x340/0x9b8
> kvm_handle_guest_abort+0x248/0x468
> handle_exit+0x150/0x1b0
> kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x778
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3c0/0x858
> ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38

Tested on Huawei Kunpeng Taishan-200 arm64 server, Using VFIO-mdev device.
Linux-5.10-rc1 tip: 3650b228

Fixes: 6d674e28 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Properly handle faulting of device mappings")
Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sashukla@nvidia.com>
---
v2:
- Per Marc's suggestion - setting force_pte=true.
- Rebased and tested for 5.10-rc1 commit: 3650b228

v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/10/21/460

arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 19aacc7..d4cd253 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -839,6 +839,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
 
 	if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn)) {
 		device = true;
+		force_pte = true;
 	} else if (logging_active && !write_fault) {
 		/*
 		 * Only actually map the page as writable if this was a write
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-26 11:24 [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: fix the mmio faulting Santosh Shukla
2020-10-26 11:24 ` Santosh Shukla [this message]
2020-10-27  4:04   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle " Gavin Shan
2020-10-29 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] KVM: arm64: fix " Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1603711447-11998-2-git-send-email-sashukla@nvidia.com \
    --to=sashukla@nvidia.com \
    --cc=cjia@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcrossley@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox