From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 12:31:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1615807885173250@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315111000.4136196-1-maz@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
kvm-arm64-ensure-i-cache-isolation-between-vcpus-of-a-same-vm.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From foo@baz Mon Mar 15 12:27:33 PM CET 2021
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:00 +0000
Subject: KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kernel-team@android.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20210315111000.4136196-1-maz@kernel.org>
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Commit 01dc9262ff5797b675c32c0c6bc682777d23de05 upstream.
It recently became apparent that the ARMv8 architecture has interesting
rules regarding attributes being used when fetching instructions
if the MMU is off at Stage-1.
In this situation, the CPU is allowed to fetch from the PoC and
allocate into the I-cache (unless the memory is mapped with
the XN attribute at Stage-2).
If we transpose this to vcpus sharing a single physical CPU,
it is possible for a vcpu running with its MMU off to influence
another vcpu running with its MMU on, as the latter is expected to
fetch from the PoU (and self-patching code doesn't flush below that
level).
In order to solve this, reuse the vcpu-private TLB invalidation
code to apply the same policy to the I-cache, nuking it every time
the vcpu runs on a physical CPU that ran another vcpu of the same
VM in the past.
This involve renaming __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid() to
__kvm_flush_cpu_context(), and inserting a local i-cache invalidation
there.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303164505.68492-1-maz@kernel.org
[maz: added 32bit ARM support]
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/kvm/hyp/tlb.c | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c | 3 ++-
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 8 +++++++-
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ extern char __kvm_hyp_init_end[];
extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm);
-extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+extern void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
extern void __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u32 cntvoff_low, u32 cntvoff_high);
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa
__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(kvm);
}
-void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void __hyp_text __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vm
isb();
write_sysreg(0, TLBIALL);
+ write_sysreg(0, ICIALLU);
dsb(nsh);
isb();
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ extern char __kvm_hyp_vector[];
extern void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa);
extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm);
-extern void __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+extern void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
extern void __kvm_timer_set_cntvoff(u32 cntvoff_low, u32 cntvoff_high);
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(str
__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
}
-void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+void __hyp_text __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vm
__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
__tlbi(vmalle1);
+ asm volatile("ic iallu");
dsb(nsh);
isb();
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -373,11 +373,17 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu
cpu_data = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data);
/*
+ * We guarantee that both TLBs and I-cache are private to each
+ * vcpu. If detecting that a vcpu from the same VM has
+ * previously run on the same physical CPU, call into the
+ * hypervisor code to nuke the relevant contexts.
+ *
+ * We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but
* We might get preempted before the vCPU actually runs, but
* over-invalidation doesn't affect correctness.
*/
if (*last_ran != vcpu->vcpu_id) {
- kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid, vcpu);
+ kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_flush_cpu_context, vcpu);
*last_ran = vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from maz@kernel.org are
queue-5.4/kvm-arm64-reject-vm-creation-when-the-default-ipa-size-is-unsupported.patch
queue-5.4/kvm-arm64-ensure-i-cache-isolation-between-vcpus-of-a-same-vm.patch
queue-5.4/kvm-arm64-fix-exclusive-limit-for-ipa-size.patch
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-15 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-15 11:10 [PATCH][stable-5.4] KVM: arm64: Ensure I-cache isolation between vcpus of a same VM Marc Zyngier
2021-03-15 11:31 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1615807885173250@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox