Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix uninitialized memcache pointer in user_mem_abort()
Date: Wed,  7 May 2025 00:56:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174660459083.2542293.85268453831284543.b4-ty@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250505173148.33900-1-sebott@redhat.com>

On Mon, 05 May 2025 19:31:48 +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Commit fce886a60207 ("KVM: arm64: Plumb the pKVM MMU in KVM") made the
> initialization of the local memcache variable in user_mem_abort()
> conditional, leaving a codepath where it is used uninitialized via
> kvm_pgtable_stage2_map().
> 
> This can fail on any path that requires a stage-2 allocation
> without transition via a permission fault or dirty logging.
> 
> [...]

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/1] KVM: arm64: Fix uninitialized memcache pointer in user_mem_abort()
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/157dbc4a321f

--
Best,
Oliver

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05 17:31 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix uninitialized memcache pointer in user_mem_abort() Sebastian Ott
2025-05-06 10:36 ` Vincent Donnefort
2025-05-07  7:56 ` Oliver Upton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174660459083.2542293.85268453831284543.b4-ty@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=sebott@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox