Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Make AArch64 support sticky
Date: Wed,  7 May 2025 00:56:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <174660459090.2542293.281555922316726481.b4-ty@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429114117.3618800-1-maz@kernel.org>

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:41:15 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It's been recently reported[1] that our sorry excuse for a test suite
> is writing a bunch of zeroes to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.EL{0,1,2,3},
> effectively removing the advertised support for AArch64 to the guest.
> 
> This leads to an interesting interaction with the NV code which reacts
> in a slightly overzealous way and inject an UNDEF at the earliest
> opportunity.
> 
> [...]

Applied to fixes, thanks!

[1/2] KVM: arm64: Prevent userspace from disabling AArch64 support at any virtualisable EL
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/7af7cfbe78e2
[2/2] KVM: arm64: selftest: Don't try to disable AArch64 support
      https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/b60e285b6acd

--
Best,
Oliver

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 11:41 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Make AArch64 support sticky Marc Zyngier
2025-04-29 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Prevent userspace from disabling AArch64 support at any virtualisable EL Marc Zyngier
2025-04-29 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftest: Don't try to disable AArch64 support Marc Zyngier
2025-04-30  5:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Make AArch64 support sticky Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2025-05-07  7:56 ` Oliver Upton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=174660459090.2542293.281555922316726481.b4-ty@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox