From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fixes and clarifications for FEAT_S1POE
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 23:49:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <175333974801.2689259.7241226036667570185.b4-ty@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701151648.754785-1-maz@kernel.org>
On Tue, 01 Jul 2025 16:16:46 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I (almost accidentally) spotted a couple of issues with the current NV
> support for S1POE:
>
> - wi->{e0,}poe and wr->{p,u}ov are used interchangeably, and sometimes
> in conjunction -- none of that makes much sense
>
> - The two rules describing WXN are not exactly been applied to the
> correct state
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/2] KVM: arm64: Remove the wi->{e0,}poe vs wr->{p,u}ov confusion
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/a508d5afb708
[2/2] KVM: arm64: Follow specification when implementing WXN
https://git.kernel.org/kvmarm/kvmarm/c/5152977340b6
--
Best,
Oliver
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 15:16 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fixes and clarifications for FEAT_S1POE Marc Zyngier
2025-07-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Remove the wi->{e0,}poe vs wr->{p,u}ov confusion Marc Zyngier
2025-07-01 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: Follow specification when implementing WXN Marc Zyngier
2025-07-24 6:49 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=175333974801.2689259.7241226036667570185.b4-ty@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox