Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] KVM: arm64: Remove dead PMU sysreg decoding code
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ed6dfd6-4ace-a562-bc2f-054a5c853fa6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201113182602.471776-7-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc,

I checked and indeed the remaining cases cover all registers that use this accessor.

However, I'm a bit torn here. The warning that I got when trying to run a guest
with the PMU feature flag set, but not initialized (reported at [1]) was also not
supposed to ever be reached:

static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
{
    switch (kvm->arch.pmuver) {
    case 1:            /* ARMv8.0 */
        return GENMASK(9, 0);
    case 4:            /* ARMv8.1 */
    case 5:            /* ARMv8.4 */
    case 6:            /* ARMv8.5 */
        return GENMASK(15, 0);
    default:        /* Shouldn't be here, just for sanity */
        WARN_ONCE(1, "Unknown PMU version %d\n", kvm->arch.pmuver);
        return 0;
    }
}

I realize it's not exactly the same thing and I'll leave it up to you if you want
to add a warning for the cases that should never happen. I'm fine either way:

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg857927.html

On 11/13/20 6:26 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The handling of traps in access_pmu_evcntr() has a couple of
> omminous "else return false;" statements that don't make any sense:
> the decoding tree coverse all the registers that trap to this handler,
> and returning false implies that we change PC, which we don't.
>
> Get rid of what is evidently dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 3bd4cc40536b..f878d71484d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -733,8 +733,6 @@ static bool access_pmu_evcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  				return false;
>  
>  			idx = ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX;
> -		} else {
> -			return false;
>  		}
>  	} else if (r->CRn == 0 && r->CRm == 9) {
>  		/* PMCCNTR */
> @@ -748,8 +746,6 @@ static bool access_pmu_evcntr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			return false;
>  
>  		idx = ((r->CRm & 3) << 3) | (r->Op2 & 7);
> -	} else {
> -		return false;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!pmu_counter_idx_valid(vcpu, idx))
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-26 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-13 18:25 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Disabled PMU handling Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_vcpu_has_pmu() helper Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: arm64: Set ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer to 0 when no PMU support Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: arm64: Refuse illegal KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 at reset time Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 14:59   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-26 15:25     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 15:49       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: arm64: Inject UNDEF on PMU access when no PMU configured Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: arm64: Remove PMU RAZ/WI handling Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 15:06   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-27  8:50     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: arm64: Remove dead PMU sysreg decoding code Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 15:18   ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2020-11-26 15:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 15:54       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-26 15:57         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: arm64: Gate kvm_pmu_update_state() on the PMU feature Marc Zyngier
2020-11-13 18:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: arm64: Get rid of the PMU ready state Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 17:28 ` [PATCH 0/8] KVM: arm64: Disabled PMU handling Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-25  8:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 16:34 ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ed6dfd6-4ace-a562-bc2f-054a5c853fa6@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox