From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow dynamic mapping of physical/virtual interrupts Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20150812114543.GA15085@cbox> References: <1438962347-17541-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1438962347-17541-7-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20150811074221.GC5007@lvm> <20150812105638.67de9423@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E9E5AB52 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:31:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ry+IVo2Ohkpj for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:31:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E545AB51 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 07:31:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by labd1 with SMTP id d1so7539272lab.1 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150812105638.67de9423@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Marc Zyngier Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Andre Przywara , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:56:38AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:42:37 +0100 > Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 04:45:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > In order to be able to feed physical interrupts to a guest, we need > > > to be able to establish the virtual-physical mapping between the two > > > worlds. > > > > > > The mappings are kept in a set of RCU lists, indexed by virtual interrupts. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > > > > Thanks for addressing all my concerns: > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall > > Thanks a lot for all the reviewing, much appreciated. > > Unless someone has an objection, I'm going put this series (minus > the last patch) into -next so it gets a bit more exposure. > Sounds good to me, when I'm back from this paper writing business tomorrow/friday, I'll give it a spin and test the UEFI reboot issue with it as well. -Christoffer