From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: arm/arm64: Count guest exit due to various reasons
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:12:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202181228.GS18376@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448532583-18715-1-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:09:43AM +0000, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> From: Amit Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
>
> It would add guest exit statistics to debugfs, This can be helpful
> while measuring KVM performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> * Defined equal number of stats for ARM and ARM64
> * Differentiated MMIO_EXIT handled between Userspace and Kernel
> * Distinguished between wfi and wfe stat counters
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | 3 +++
> arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 3 +++
> 8 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 6692982..872640e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
> u32 halt_successful_poll;
> u32 halt_attempted_poll;
> u32 halt_wakeup;
> + u32 hvc_exit_stat;
> + u64 wfe_exit_stat;
> + u64 wfi_exit_stat;
> + u64 mmio_exit_handled_in_userspace_stat;
> + u64 mmio_exit_handled_in_kernel_stat;
eh, I think these should just be called mmio_exit_user and
mmio_exit_kernel
> + u64 exits;
> };
>
> int kvm_vcpu_preferred_target(struct kvm_vcpu_init *init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index e06fd29..8a79a57 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -603,6 +603,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> ret = kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_vcpu_run, vcpu);
>
> vcpu->mode = OUTSIDE_GUEST_MODE;
> + vcpu->stat.exits++;
> /*
> * Back from guest
> *************************************************************/
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> index 96e935b..8323241 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,12 @@
> #define VCPU_STAT(x) { #x, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VCPU }
>
> struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
> + VCPU_STAT(hvc_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(wfe_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(wfi_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(mmio_exit_handled_in_userspace_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(mmio_exit_handled_in_kernel_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(exits),
> { NULL }
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 95f12b2..3ede90d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>
> trace_kvm_hvc(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0),
> kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
> + vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++;
>
> ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -89,9 +90,11 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> {
> if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_WFI_IS_WFE) {
> trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> + vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
> } else {
> trace_kvm_wfx(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> + vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> index 974b1c6..b66c3a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> @@ -209,8 +209,11 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>
> if (!ret) {
> /* We handled the access successfully in the kernel. */
> + vcpu->stat.mmio_exit_handled_in_kernel_stat++;
> kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
> return 1;
> + } else {
> + vcpu->stat.mmio_exit_handled_in_userspace_stat++;
> }
>
> run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a35ce72..ad29508 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
> u32 halt_successful_poll;
> u32 halt_attempted_poll;
> u32 halt_wakeup;
> + u32 hvc_exit_stat;
> + u64 wfe_exit_stat;
> + u64 wfi_exit_stat;
> + u64 mmio_exit_handled_in_userspace_stat;
> + u64 mmio_exit_handled_in_kernel_stat;
same problem with naming
> + u64 exits;
> };
>
> int kvm_vcpu_preferred_target(struct kvm_vcpu_init *init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index d250160..ad9ea95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,16 @@
>
> #include "trace.h"
>
> +#define VM_STAT(x) { #x, offsetof(struct kvm, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VM }
> +#define VCPU_STAT(x) { #x, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, stat.x), KVM_STAT_VCPU }
> +
> struct kvm_stats_debugfs_item debugfs_entries[] = {
> + VCPU_STAT(hvc_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(wfe_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(wfi_exit_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(mmio_exit_handled_in_userspace_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(mmio_exit_handled_in_kernel_stat),
> + VCPU_STAT(exits),
> { NULL }
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 68a0759..2894649 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>
> trace_kvm_hvc_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0),
> kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu));
> + vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++;
>
> ret = kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -71,9 +72,11 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> {
> if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE) {
> trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), true);
> + vcpu->stat.wfe_exit_stat++;
> kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu);
> } else {
> trace_kvm_wfx_arm64(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), false);
> + vcpu->stat.wfi_exit_stat++;
> kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
I've applied this patch to queue with the naming changed.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 10:09 [PATCH v2] KVM: arm/arm64: Count guest exit due to various reasons Amit Singh Tomar
2015-12-02 18:12 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-12-02 19:36 ` Amit Tomer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151202181228.GS18376@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=amittomer25@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox