From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:59:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20170112095932.q54jyb33gxyp2ccu@localhost> References: <20170111144118.17062-1-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170111144118.17062-2-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170111180627.GG20288@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20170111183339.GC29247@leverpostej> <5da456f8-fcc5-b6e2-d58b-01a671da595b@codeaurora.org> <20170111183738.GD29247@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD195402A3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:57:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZlWwlAQZxHqI for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:57:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A234940296 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 04:57:50 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170111183738.GD29247@leverpostej> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Mark Rutland Cc: Mark Langsdorf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Marc Zyngier , Jon Masters , Timur Tabi , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 06:37:39PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:35:55PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > > On 01/11/2017 12:33 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > >It'll need to affect all lines since the kconfig column needs to expand > > >by at least one character to fit QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003. > > > > Or we can make the macro shorter. > > The name, as it is, is perfectly descriptive. > > Let's not sacrifice legibility over a non-issue. I agree, I didn't realise that the we expand the last column already. It's a non-issue indeed. -- Catalin