public inbox for kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: arm/arm64: Provide a vgic interrupt line level sample function
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:39:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170829093902.15379-5-cdall@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170829093902.15379-1-cdall@linaro.org>

The GIC sometimes need to sample the physical line of a mapped
interrupt.  As we know this to be notoriously slow, provide a callback
function for devices (such as the timer) which can do this much faster
than talking to the distributor, for example by comparing a few
in-memory values.  Fall back to the good old method of poking the
physical GIC if no callback is provided.

Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h    | 13 ++++++++++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c  |  7 ++++++-
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 53f631b..a52990b 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -125,6 +125,17 @@ struct vgic_irq {
 	u8 priority;
 	enum vgic_irq_config config;	/* Level or edge */
 
+	/*
+	 * Callback function pointer to in-kernel devices that can tell us the
+	 * state of the input level of mapped level-triggered IRQ faster than
+	 * peaking into the physical GIC.
+	 *
+	 * Always called in non-preemptible section and the functions can use
+	 * kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu() to get the vcpu pointer for private
+	 * IRQs.
+	 */
+	bool (*get_input_level)(int vintid);
+
 	void *owner;			/* Opaque pointer to reserve an interrupt
 					   for in-kernel devices. */
 };
@@ -309,7 +320,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void);
 int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
 			bool level, void *owner);
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
-			  u32 vintid);
+			  u32 vintid, bool (*callback)(int vindid));
 int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
 bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid);
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
index b24e2f7..82169ef 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
@@ -643,6 +643,19 @@ static bool timer_irqs_are_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool timer_get_input_level(int vintid)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu();
+	struct arch_timer_context *timer;
+
+	if (vintid == vcpu_vtimer(vcpu)->irq.irq)
+		timer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
+	else
+		BUG(); /* We only map the vtimer so far */
+
+	return kvm_timer_should_fire(timer);
+}
+
 int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
@@ -664,7 +677,8 @@ int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, host_vtimer_irq, vtimer->irq.irq);
+	ret = kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(vcpu, host_vtimer_irq, vtimer->irq.irq,
+				    &timer_get_input_level);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index e3ce2fa..0466c10 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ bool vgic_irq_line_level(struct vgic_irq *irq)
 
 	BUG_ON(!irq->hw);
 
+	if (irq->get_input_level)
+		return irq->get_input_level(irq->intid);
+
 	WARN_ON(irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
 				      IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
 				      &line_level));
@@ -429,7 +432,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
 }
 
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
-			  u32 vintid)
+			  u32 vintid, bool (*callback)(int vindid))
 {
 	struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, vintid);
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
@@ -456,6 +459,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int host_irq,
 	irq->hw = true;
 	irq->host_irq = host_irq;
 	irq->hwintid = data->hwirq;
+	irq->get_input_level = callback;
 
 out:
 	spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
@@ -476,6 +480,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_unmap_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int vintid)
 	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 	irq->hw = false;
 	irq->hwintid = 0;
+	irq->get_input_level = NULL;
 	spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
 	vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 
-- 
2.9.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-29  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-29  9:38 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Handle forwarded level-triggered interrupts Christoffer Dall
2017-08-29  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: restructure kvm_vgic_(un)map_phys_irq Christoffer Dall
2017-09-02 11:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-29  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Support level-triggered mapped interrupts Christoffer Dall
2017-08-30  8:19   ` Auger Eric
2017-08-30  9:20     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-30 10:13       ` Auger Eric
2017-08-30 12:03         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-30 12:57           ` Auger Eric
2017-09-02 10:52   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-09-02 20:37     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-09-02 11:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-09-02 20:23     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-29  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: arm/arm64: Rearrange kvm_vgic_[un]map_phys code in vgic.c Christoffer Dall
2017-09-02 11:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-29  9:39 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-09-02 11:20   ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: arm/arm64: Provide a vgic interrupt line level sample function Marc Zyngier
2017-09-02 20:41     ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170829093902.15379-5-cdall@linaro.org \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox