Re: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls

Alex Bennée
2017-09-14T11:01:26Z

Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:

> The EFI runtime services ABI allows EFI to make free use of the
> FPSIMD registers during EFI runtime service calls, subject to the
> callee-save requirements of the AArch64 procedure call standard.
>
> However, the SVE architecture allows upper bits of the SVE vector
> registers to be zeroed as a side-effect of FPSIMD V-register
> writes. This means that the SVE vector registers must be saved in
> their entirety in order to avoid data loss: non-SVE-aware EFI
> implementations cannot restore them correctly.
>
> The non-IRQ case is already handled gracefully by
> kernel_neon_begin(). For the IRQ case, this patch allocates a
> suitable per-CPU stash buffer for the full SVE register state and
> uses it to preserve the affected registers around EFI calls. It is
> currently unclear how the EFI runtime services ABI will be
> clarified with respect to SVE, so it safest to assume that the
> predicate registers and FFR must be saved and restored too.
>
> No attempt is made to restore the restore the vector length after
> a call, for now. It is deemed rather insane for EFI to change it,
> and contemporary EFI implementations certainly won't.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1
> ----------------
>
> Requested by Ard Biesheuvel:
>
> * Fix unbalanced ifelse bracing to conform to the kernel coding style.
>
> * Make efi_sve_state_used static.
>
> Changes related to Alex Bennée's comments:
>
> * Migrate away from magic numbers for SVE_VQ_BYTES.
>
> Other:
>
> * Rename sve_kernel_mode_neon_setup() to sve_efi_setup().
> The EFI FPSIMD code is something semi-independent from kernel-mode NEON
> now, so the "neon" in the names no longer really makes sense.
>
> * Make the EFI FPSIMD setup code dependent on CONFIG_EFI (it's not
> supposed to work with CONFIG_EFI=n anyway).
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index dd89acf..fff9fcf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ static int sve_default_vl = -1;
> int __ro_after_init sve_max_vl = -1;
> /* Set of available vector lengths, as vq_to_bit(vq): */
> static __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
> +static void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
>
> #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
>
> /* Dummy declaration for code that will be optimised out: */
> extern __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
> +extern void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
>
> #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
>
> @@ -447,6 +449,23 @@ int sve_verify_vq_map(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void __init sve_efi_setup(void)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * alloc_percpu() warns and prints a backtrace if this goes wrong.
> + * This is evidence of a crippled system and we are returning void,
> + * so no attempt is made to handle this situation here.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(sve_max_vl));
> + efi_sve_state = __alloc_percpu(
> + SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(sve_max_vl)), SVE_VQ_BYTES);
> + if (!efi_sve_state)
> + panic("Cannot allocate percpu memory for EFI SVE save/restore");
> +}
> +
> void __init sve_setup(void)
> {
> u64 zcr;
> @@ -482,6 +501,8 @@ void __init sve_setup(void)
> sve_max_vl);
> pr_info("SVE: default vector length %u bytes per vector\n",
> sve_default_vl);
> +
> + sve_efi_setup();
> }
>
> void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
> @@ -783,6 +804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_neon_end);
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpsimd_state, efi_fpsimd_state);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_fpsimd_state_used);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_sve_state_used);
>
> /*
> * EFI runtime services support functions
> @@ -808,10 +830,24 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void)
>
> WARN_ON(preemptible());
>
> - if (may_use_simd())
> + if (may_use_simd()) {
> kernel_neon_begin();
> - else {
> - fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * If !efi_sve_state, SVE can't be in use yet and doesn't need
> + * preserving:
> + */
> + if (system_supports_sve() && likely(efi_sve_state)) {
> + char *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
> +
> + __this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, true);
> +
> + sve_save_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
> + &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr);
> + } else {
> + fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> + }
> +
> __this_cpu_write(efi_fpsimd_state_used, true);
> }
> }
> @@ -824,10 +860,22 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_end(void)
> if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
> return;
>
> - if (__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false))
> - fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> - else
> + if (!__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false)) {
> kernel_neon_end();
> + } else {
> + if (system_supports_sve() &&
> + likely(__this_cpu_read(efi_sve_state_used))) {
> + char const *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
> +
> + sve_load_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
> + &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr,
> + sve_vq_from_vl(sve_get_vl()) - 1);
> +
> + __this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, false);
> + } else {
> + fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */