public inbox for kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: kvm_arch_destroy_vm cleanups
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:09:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201080919.GC4218@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171127181718.5290-1-drjones@redhat.com>

Hi Drew,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 07:17:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Recently commit b2c9a85dd75a ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move
> kvm_vgic_destroy call around") caught my eye. When I looked closer I
> saw that while it made the code saner, it wasn't changing anything.
> kvm_for_each_vcpu() checks for NULL kvm->vcpus[i], so there wasn't
> a NULL dereference being fixed, and because kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy()
> was called by kvm_arch_vcpu_free() it was still getting called, just
> not by kvm_vgic_destroy() as intended. But now the call from
> kvm_arch_vcpu_free() is redundant, and while currently harmless, it
> should be removed in case kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy() were ever to
> want to reference vgic state, as kvm_vgic_destroy() now comes before
> kvm_arch_vcpu_free(). Additionally the other architectures set
> kvm->online_vcpus to zero after freeing them. We might as well do
> that for ARM too.

Could this commit message be rewritten to:

  kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy already gets called from kvm_vgic_destroy for
  each vcpu, so we don't have to call it from kvm_arch_vcpu_free.

  Additionally the other architectures set kvm->online_vcpus to zero
  after freeing them. We might as well do that for ARM too.

?

Thanks,
-Christoffer



> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index a6524ff27de4..c5bc79c4ccf7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  			kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	atomic_set(&kvm->online_vcpus, 0);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> @@ -296,7 +297,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	kvm_mmu_free_memory_caches(vcpu);
>  	kvm_timer_vcpu_terminate(vcpu);
> -	kvm_vgic_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
>  	kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(vcpu);
>  	kvm_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
>  	kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu);
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27 18:17 [PATCH] KVM: arm/arm64: kvm_arch_destroy_vm cleanups Andrew Jones
2017-12-01  8:09 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-12-01  8:18   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01  9:46     ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171201080919.GC4218@cbox \
    --to=cdall@linaro.org \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox