From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A52ECA9EAF for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351F921929 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 19:42:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 351F921929 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB14E4A5C6; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqA3K2sp8EL5; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A84A4A5D9; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B8B4A5C5 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7T+iD-buMYh for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1BF14A3A3 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:42:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2019 12:42:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,225,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="399877874" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.41]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2019 12:42:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 12:42:14 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: Terminate memslot walks via used_slots Message-ID: <20191024194214.GB28043@linux.intel.com> References: <20191022003537.13013-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <20191022003537.13013-15-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> <642f73ee-9425-0149-f4f4-f56be9ae5713@redhat.com> <20191022152827.GC2343@linux.intel.com> <625e511f-bd35-3b92-0c6d-550c10fc5827@redhat.com> <20191022155220.GD2343@linux.intel.com> <5c61c094-ee32-4dcf-b3ae-092eba0159c5@redhat.com> <20191024193856.GA28043@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191024193856.GA28043@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Cornelia Huck , Wanpeng Li , Janosch Frank , kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan , Joerg Roedel , David Hildenbrand , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Christian Borntraeger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , Vitaly Kuznetsov , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jim Mattson X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:38:56PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:53:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 22/10/19 17:52, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > > > Anyways, I'm not at all opposed to adding comments, just want to make sure > > > I'm not forgetting something. If it's ok with you, I'll comment the code > > > and/or functions and reply here to refine them without having to respin > > > the whole series. > > > > Yes, I agree this is better. > > Here's what I ended up with. I also added kvm_memslot_insert_back() to > help document the purpose of incrementing used_slots, and renamed > kvm_shift_memslots_forward()->kvm_memslot_move_backward() and > kvm_shift_memslots_backward()->kvm_memslot_move_forward() because I was > having trouble reconciling having the comments focus on the changed > memslot while the names of the functions reflected what happens to the > other memslots. Oh, and I need to respin the series to fix build bugs on MIPS and PPC, I'll wait to do that until I get a thumbs up on this code. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm