From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D51EC432C3 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:51:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016972071F for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:51:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 016972071F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ACB4AEE3; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:29 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-JReDdwy84v; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994854AEF1; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA944AEC6 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:28 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NaOZX2U17hkU for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org (inca-roads.misterjones.org [213.251.177.50]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1147E4AC87 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:51:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iXT4P-0007RI-Tj; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:43:10 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= Subject: [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Don't rely on the wrong pending table Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:42:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20191120164236.29359-20-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20191120164236.29359-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, graf@amazon.com, drjones@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de, julien.grall@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, steven.price@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org, yuzenghui@huawei.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, stable@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Heinrich Schuchardt , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Price , Christian Borntraeger , Julien Grall , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Zenghui Yu It's possible that two LPIs locate in the same "byte_offset" but target two different vcpus, where their pending status are indicated by two different pending tables. In such a scenario, using last_byte_offset optimization will lead KVM relying on the wrong pending table entry. Let us use last_ptr instead, which can be treated as a byte index into a pending table and also, can be vcpu specific. Fixes: 280771252c1b ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SAVE_PENDING_TABLES") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Acked-by: Eric Auger Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191029071919.177-4-yuzenghui@huawei.com --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c index e69c538a24ca..f45635a6f0ec 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c @@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ int vgic_v3_lpi_sync_pending_status(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq) int vgic_v3_save_pending_tables(struct kvm *kvm) { struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic; - int last_byte_offset = -1; struct vgic_irq *irq; + gpa_t last_ptr = ~(gpa_t)0; int ret; u8 val; @@ -384,11 +384,11 @@ int vgic_v3_save_pending_tables(struct kvm *kvm) bit_nr = irq->intid % BITS_PER_BYTE; ptr = pendbase + byte_offset; - if (byte_offset != last_byte_offset) { + if (ptr != last_ptr) { ret = kvm_read_guest_lock(kvm, ptr, &val, 1); if (ret) return ret; - last_byte_offset = byte_offset; + last_ptr = ptr; } stored = val & (1U << bit_nr); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm