From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5101EC433DF for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBE120702 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DBBE120702 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699FC4B155; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wubAHGoGXRxf; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9B84B151; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003524B117 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BaU+0k68TULT for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9315D4B10F for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:27:02 -0400 (EDT) IronPort-SDR: XWXo2YAOU7LkY2o9oUcvKT2aqF/Bp5dWa29ZvfgFeO0fZSEs2Xo6dXAUrKuFK1wNEg+/deQAMC ez6tQpcYLycA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9661"; a="131571504" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,272,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="131571504" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2020 10:26:59 -0700 IronPort-SDR: dFkTC0Q3VbYtMwEZFits5/7wHj7dRqejoXJIagA8vcDlFKA9TiqfEssKP0af/RV+QvSnY0a5QI IIkrU34/15jg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,272,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="478939562" Received: from sjchrist-coffee.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.54.74.152]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Jun 2020 10:26:58 -0700 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:26:58 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Paolo Bonzini , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] KVM: Cleanup and unify kvm_mmu_memory_cache usage Message-ID: <20200623172658.GF23842@linux.intel.com> References: <20200622200822.4426-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200622200822.4426-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Junaid Shahid , Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Peter Shier , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ben Gardon , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Peter Feiner , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jim Mattson X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 01:08:01PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Note, patch 18 will conflict with the p4d rework in 5.8. I originally > stated I would send v2 only after that got pulled into Paolo's tree, but > I got my timing wrong, i.e. I was thinking that would have already > happened. I'll send v3 if necessary. I wanted to get v2 out there now > that I actually compile tested other architectures. Gah, too impatient by one day :-) I'll spin v3 later in the week. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm