From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97637C4741F for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F132020739 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kHB3Qqh3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F132020739 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BAB4B2E6; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d+26TnsS02yN; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627064B337; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F264B28E for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8Bkvno6sQWn for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F2A14B301 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:55:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3808420756; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604076930; bh=exFtqjukX2VCvc8Zm33L4Y5eBjgmOnSnxmfGVDjdUQo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kHB3Qqh35wiuxkxZOouLIN/+Ds3Ypy3GPpDXyit0fTlOmJXA+DNUYEtg/FOoj2nfF iRnnqzIM/xNzZdSIcNnMDnrU2tUELVw0JbfVsFtf3LhjGXfv4kjJvkwKSXRjbSfJag E8C0K3rO4WDqnf/CnkXLbWxDZyW/XaDb1pE/cWAU= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kYXS2-005noK-NH; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:40:30 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: [PATCH 10/12] arm64: cpufeature: reorder cpus_have_{const, final}_cap() Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:40:15 +0000 Message-Id: <20201030164017.244287-11-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201030164017.244287-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20201030164017.244287-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: pbonzini@redhat.com, dbrazdil@google.com, gshan@redhat.com, james.morse@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, qperret@google.com, sashukla@nvidia.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, will@kernel.org, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Qais Yousef X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Mark Rutland In a subsequent patch we'll modify cpus_have_const_cap() to call cpus_have_final_cap(), and hence we need to define cpus_have_final_cap() first. To make subsequent changes easier to follow, this patch reorders the two without making any other changes. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: David Brazdil Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026134931.28246-3-mark.rutland@arm.com --- arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index fba6700b457b..9f671aa0419b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -428,35 +428,35 @@ static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) } /* - * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check. + * Test for a capability without a runtime check. * - * Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap(). + * Before capabilities are finalized, this will BUG(). * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check. * * @num must be a compile-time constant. */ -static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num) { if (system_capabilities_finalized()) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); else - return cpus_have_cap(num); + BUG(); } /* - * Test for a capability without a runtime check. + * Test for a capability, possibly with a runtime check. * - * Before capabilities are finalized, this will BUG(). + * Before capabilities are finalized, this behaves as cpus_have_cap(). * After capabilities are finalized, this is patched to avoid a runtime check. * * @num must be a compile-time constant. */ -static __always_inline bool cpus_have_final_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (system_capabilities_finalized()) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); else - BUG(); + return cpus_have_cap(num); } static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num) -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm