From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA25CC63697 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290182074B for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qyKSf+mo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 290182074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57F64BA10; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:28 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZzAPvVHufUm; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A664BA9A; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE924B715 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:23 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4hI+cDyRI8z for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924AE4B7A0 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:26:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B273B20759; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1605291980; bh=gY/VRsiPzRuoQjrUpaFkSuVWs50kFr+mHGg8iLcn3xs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qyKSf+moAYGtWWDjfKeEo01OP2lMgRMqd2zIk6o456bvQfCX/WSbUERqz+SMN47/D RlSSOh0yn1eghW3QeAKqezJufFDz3k8jBmmkRUBJHLj5hMi1Binku54KLIXI+P4mmB 2Fp56zja5vdZ7cduoj88ICsT8ignDc3S1F//WnEM= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kddm6-00APrY-Uk; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:26:19 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 7/8] KVM: arm64: Gate kvm_pmu_update_state() on the PMU feature Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:26:01 +0000 Message-Id: <20201113182602.471776-8-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20201113182602.471776-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20201113182602.471776-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kernel-team@android.com X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu We currently gate the update of the PMU state on the PMU being "ready". The "ready" state is only set to true when the first vcpu run is successful, and if it isn't, we never reach the update code. So the "ready" state is never the right thing to check for, and it should instead be the presence of the PMU feature, which makes a bit more sense. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c index 200f2a0d8d17..8806fdc85e8a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; bool overflow; - if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu)) + if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)) return; overflow = !!kvm_pmu_overflow_status(vcpu); -- 2.28.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm