From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF45C4361B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B8823E56 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:03:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 83B8823E56 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259594B1E4; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZNlb-P9tNBI; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8334B238; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2864B1B3 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f4LuOyIv4aJd for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0FA4B24B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAFB923E24; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1knOMz-0008Di-KD; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:00:41 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 15/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle HCR_EL2.E2H specially Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20201210160002.1407373-16-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20201210160002.1407373-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Andre Przywara X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu HCR_EL2.E2H is nasty, as a flip of this bit completely changes the way we deal with a lot of the state. So when the guest flips this bit (sysregs are live), do the put/load dance so that we have a consistent state. Yes, this is slow. Don't do it. Suggested-by: Alexandru Elisei Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 77a2d452b79d..e7db4d809674 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -183,9 +183,24 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg) goto memory_write; if (unlikely(get_el2_mapping(reg, &el1r, &xlate))) { + bool need_put_load; + if (!is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) goto memory_write; + /* + * HCR_EL2.E2H is nasty: it changes the way we interpret a + * lot of the EL2 state, so treat is as a full state + * transition. + */ + need_put_load = ((reg == HCR_EL2) && + vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu) != !!(val & HCR_E2H)); + + if (need_put_load) { + preempt_disable(); + kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu); + } + /* * Always store a copy of the write to memory to avoid having * to reverse-translate virtual EL2 system registers for a @@ -193,6 +208,11 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, int reg) */ __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val; + if (need_put_load) { + kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, smp_processor_id()); + preempt_enable(); + } + switch (reg) { case ELR_EL2: write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_ELR); -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm