From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B48CC433FE for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE123F28 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:04:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C9CE123F28 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D294B28D; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:27 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xq8C+MVIQV44; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CF74B293; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AF84B299 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ft+EDMh3eFYA for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4444B28D for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:04:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 493B223D50; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1knON8-0008Di-Vs; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:00:51 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 21/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:17 +0000 Message-Id: <20201210160002.1407373-22-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201210160002.1407373-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20201210160002.1407373-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com, jintack.lim@linaro.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Andre Przywara , Jintack Lim X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Jintack Lim VMs used to execute hvc #0 for the psci call if EL3 is not implemented. However, when we come to provide the virtual EL2 mode to the VM, the host OS inside the VM calls kvm_call_hyp() which is also hvc #0. So, it's hard to differentiate between them from the host hypervisor's point of view. So, let the VM execute smc instruction for the psci call. On ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, a smc instruction executed at non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than being treated as UNDEFINED. So, the host hypervisor can handle this psci call without any confusion. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index 56f8a77b9d4a..fe1dc0551991 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { + int ret; + /* * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a @@ -69,10 +71,28 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would * otherwise return to the same address... + * + * If imm is non-zero, it's not defined, so just skip it. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) { + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_incr_pc(vcpu); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If imm is zero, it's a psci call. + * Note that on ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, SMC executed + * at Non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than + * being treated as UNDEFINED. */ - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); + if (ret < 0) + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_incr_pc(vcpu); - return 1; + + return ret; } /* -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm