From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34353C43381 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921E764E77 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:48:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 921E764E77 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209CA4B790; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czrmfpVu13QL; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0546A4B780; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966A84B777 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oN4lrlnEKN3k for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721434B714 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 06:48:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B70764E10; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l9RVg-00D33Z-Gh; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 11:48:48 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:48:43 +0000 Message-Id: <20210209114844.3278746-2-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210209114844.3278746-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210209114844.3278746-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Andre Przywara , kernel-team@android.com X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu We currently find out about the presence of a HW PMU (or the handling of that PMU by perf, which amounts to the same thing) in a fairly roundabout way, by checking the number of counters available to perf. That's good enough for now, but we will soon need to find about about that on paths where perf is out of reach (in the world switch). Instead, let's turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 10 ++++++++++ arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 10 ---------- include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 9 +++++++-- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c index d45b8b9a4415..739164324afe 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_arm_pmu_available); + static int kvm_is_in_guest(void) { return kvm_get_running_vcpu() != NULL; @@ -48,6 +50,14 @@ static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = { int kvm_perf_init(void) { + /* + * Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of + * hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of + * a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0) + static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available); + return perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs); } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c index 4ad66a532e38..44d500706ab9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c @@ -813,16 +813,6 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1) return val & mask; } -bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) -{ - /* - * Check if HW_PERF_EVENTS are supported by checking the number of - * hardware performance counters. This could ensure the presence of - * a physical PMU and CONFIG_PERF_EVENT is selected. - */ - return (perf_num_counters() > 0); -} - int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { if (!kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu)) diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h index 8dcb3e1477bc..6fd3cda608e4 100644 --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1) #define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS ((ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS + 1) >> 1) +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_arm_pmu_available); + +static __always_inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) +{ + return static_branch_likely(&kvm_arm_pmu_available); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_HW_PERF_EVENTS struct kvm_pmc { @@ -47,7 +54,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val); void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx); -bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void); int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr); int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@ -87,7 +93,6 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {} static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data, u64 select_idx) {} -static inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) { return false; } static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr) { -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm