From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0071DC433E0 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E6B64EAF for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:42:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 46E6B64EAF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FF44B28E; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:21 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LHSUoDJh0NV; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB7E4B388; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E628C4B28E for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:18 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bSsEoUQHXYKf for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F164B279 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:42:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57F9106F; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from slackpad.fritz.box (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F3893F73D; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:42:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:41:17 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Alexandru Elisei Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 21/21] hw/rtc: ARM/arm64: Use MMIO at higher addresses Message-ID: <20210218164117.15fbd67a@slackpad.fritz.box> In-Reply-To: <102807a0-812f-d4bf-b8b4-560f999c6e6c@arm.com> References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-22-andre.przywara@arm.com> <102807a0-812f-d4bf-b8b4-560f999c6e6c@arm.com> Organization: Arm Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-slackware-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:33:15 +0000 Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 12/10/20 2:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > Using the RTC device at its legacy I/O address as set by IBM in 1981 > > was a kludge we used for simplicity on ARM platforms as well. > > However this imposes problems due to their missing alignment and overlap > > with the PCI I/O address space. > > > > Now that we can switch a device easily between using ioports and > > MMIO, let's move the RTC out of the first 4K of memory on ARM platforms. > > > > That should be transparent for well behaved guests, since the change is > > naturally reflected in the device tree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > --- > > hw/rtc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/rtc.c b/hw/rtc.c > > index ee4c9102..bdb88f0f 100644 > > --- a/hw/rtc.c > > +++ b/hw/rtc.c > > @@ -5,6 +5,15 @@ > > > > #include > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) > > +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE DEVICE_BUS_MMIO > > +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS 0x1010000 > > This looks correct, the base address is the serial base address + 64k, so they > don't overlap, and it doesn't overlap with the flash memory either. Same comment > as for the serial, I think the reason for choosing this address should be > mentioned, and the region should be put in the arch memory layout file. Other than > that, the patch looks good. Yep, will do! Thanks, Andre > > > +#else > > +/* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */ > > +#define RTC_BUS_TYPE DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT > > +#define RTC_BASE_ADDRESS 0x70 > > +#endif > > + > > /* > > * MC146818 RTC registers > > */ > > @@ -49,7 +58,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > > time_t ti; > > > > if (is_write) { > > - if (addr == 0x70) { /* index register */ > > + if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS) { /* index register */ > > u8 value = ioport__read8(data); > > > > vcpu->kvm->nmi_disabled = value & (1UL << 7); > > @@ -70,7 +79,7 @@ static void cmos_ram_io(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, > > return; > > } > > > > - if (addr == 0x70) > > + if (addr == RTC_BASE_ADDRESS) /* index register is write-only */ > > return; > > > > time(&ti); > > @@ -127,7 +136,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt, > > u8 irq, > > enum irq_type)) > > { > > - u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(0x70), cpu_to_fdt64(2) }; > > + u64 reg_prop[2] = { cpu_to_fdt64(RTC_BASE_ADDRESS), cpu_to_fdt64(2) }; > > > > _FDT(fdt_begin_node(fdt, "rtc")); > > _FDT(fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", "motorola,mc146818")); > > @@ -139,7 +148,7 @@ static void generate_rtc_fdt_node(void *fdt, > > #endif > > > > struct device_header rtc_dev_hdr = { > > - .bus_type = DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT, > > + .bus_type = RTC_BUS_TYPE, > > .data = generate_rtc_fdt_node, > > }; > > > > @@ -151,8 +160,8 @@ int rtc__init(struct kvm *kvm) > > if (r < 0) > > return r; > > > > - /* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */ > > - r = kvm__register_pio(kvm, 0x0070, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL); > > + r = kvm__register_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, 2, cmos_ram_io, NULL, > > + RTC_BUS_TYPE); > > if (r < 0) > > goto out_device; > > > > @@ -170,8 +179,7 @@ dev_init(rtc__init); > > > > int rtc__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > > { > > - /* PORT 0070-007F - CMOS RAM/RTC (REAL TIME CLOCK) */ > > - kvm__deregister_pio(kvm, 0x0070); > > + kvm__deregister_iotrap(kvm, RTC_BASE_ADDRESS, RTC_BUS_TYPE); > > > > return 0; > > } _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm