From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8252CC43460 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9470613BB for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:50:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E9470613BB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BAC4B728; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kk0CqOrIHF8; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4551D4B73A; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4AA4B6A5 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iSoPQP5i3oe9 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09754B6C6 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 07:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FLcz764x4zpYXY; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:47:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-TMVL5KK.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.128) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:50:33 +0800 From: Yanan Wang To: Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , "Quentin Perret" , Alexandru Elisei , , , , Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: arm64: Improve efficiency of stage2 page table Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:50:26 +0800 Message-ID: <20210415115032.35760-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.128] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: Catalin Marinas X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi, This series makes some efficiency improvement of guest stage-2 page table code, and there are some test results to quantify the benefit. The code has been re-arranged based on the latest kvmarm/next tree. Descriptions: We currently uniformly permorm CMOs of D-cache and I-cache in function user_mem_abort before calling the fault handlers. If we get concurrent guest faults(e.g. translation faults, permission faults) or some really unnecessary guest faults caused by BBM, CMOs for the first vcpu are necessary while the others later are not. By moving CMOs to the fault handlers, we can easily identify conditions where they are really needed and avoid the unnecessary ones. As it's a time consuming process to perform CMOs especially when flushing a block range, so this solution reduces much load of kvm and improve efficiency of the stage-2 page table code. In this series, patch #1, #3, #4 make preparation for place movement of CMOs (adapt to the latest stage-2 page table framework). And patch #2, #5 move CMOs of D-cache and I-cache to the fault handlers. Patch #6 introduces a new way to distinguish cases of memcache allocations. The following are results in v3 to represent the benefit introduced by movement of CMOs, and they were tested by [1] (kvm/selftest) that I have posted recently. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210302125751.19080-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ When there are muitiple vcpus concurrently accessing the same memory region, we can test the execution time of KVM creating new mappings, updating the permissions of old mappings from RO to RW, and the time of re-creating the blocks after they have been split. hardware platform: HiSilicon Kunpeng920 Server host kernel: Linux mainline v5.12-rc2 cmdline: ./kvm_page_table_test -m 4 -s anonymous -b 1G -v 80 (80 vcpus, 1G memory, page mappings(normal 4K)) KVM_CREATE_MAPPINGS: before 104.35s -> after 90.42s +13.35% KVM_UPDATE_MAPPINGS: before 78.64s -> after 75.45s + 4.06% cmdline: ./kvm_page_table_test -m 4 -s anonymous_thp -b 20G -v 40 (40 vcpus, 20G memory, block mappings(THP 2M)) KVM_CREATE_MAPPINGS: before 15.66s -> after 6.92s +55.80% KVM_UPDATE_MAPPINGS: before 178.80s -> after 123.35s +31.00% KVM_REBUILD_BLOCKS: before 187.34s -> after 131.76s +30.65% cmdline: ./kvm_page_table_test -m 4 -s anonymous_hugetlb_1gb -b 20G -v 40 (40 vcpus, 20G memory, block mappings(HUGETLB 1G)) KVM_CREATE_MAPPINGS: before 104.54s -> after 3.70s +96.46% KVM_UPDATE_MAPPINGS: before 174.20s -> after 115.94s +33.44% KVM_REBUILD_BLOCKS: before 103.95s -> after 2.96s +97.15% --- Changelogs: v4->v5: - rebased on the latest kvmarm/tree to adapt to the new stage-2 page-table code - v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210409033652.28316-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ v3->v4: - perform D-cache flush if we are not mapping device memory - rebased on top of mainline v5.12-rc6 - v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210326031654.3716-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ v2->v3: - drop patch #3 in v2 - retest v3 based on v5.12-rc2 - v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210310094319.18760-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ v1->v2: - rebased on top of mainline v5.12-rc2 - also move CMOs of I-cache to the fault handlers - retest v2 based on v5.12-rc2 - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210208112250.163568-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com/ --- Yanan Wang (6): KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_PGTABLE_S2_GUEST stage-2 flag KVM: arm64: Move D-cache flush to the fault handlers KVM: arm64: Add mm_ops member for structure stage2_attr_data KVM: arm64: Provide invalidate_icache_range at non-VHE EL2 KVM: arm64: Move I-cache flush to the fault handlers KVM: arm64: Distinguish cases of memcache allocations completely arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 31 ------------- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 38 ++++++++++------ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/cache.S | 11 +++++ arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 51 ++++++++-------------- 5 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm