From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEB9C433B4 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 17:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADF4614A5 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 17:27:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0ADF4614A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48604B5A3; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xenBBnazELMr; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB6E4B490; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B804B2A0 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9hYX6iRfQPFJ for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60F04B2FC for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 13:27:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E109161481; Mon, 10 May 2021 17:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1lg9Fw-000Uqg-KM; Mon, 10 May 2021 17:59:44 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 10/66] KVM: arm64: nv: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:58:24 +0100 Message-Id: <20210510165920.1913477-11-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210510165920.1913477-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210510165920.1913477-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, haibo.xu@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com, jintack.lim@linaro.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Andre Przywara , Jintack Lim X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Jintack Lim As we expect all PSCI calls from the L1 hypervisor to be performed using SMC when nested virtualization is enabled, it is clear that all HVC instruction from the VM (including from the virtual EL2) are supposed to handled in the virtual EL2. Forward these to EL2 as required. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim [maz: add handling of HCR_EL2.HCD] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index 6f48336b1d86..6add422d63b8 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -40,6 +41,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)); vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++; + /* Forward hvc instructions to the virtual EL2 if the guest has EL2. */ + if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) { + if (vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & HCR_HCD) + kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu); + else + kvm_inject_nested_sync(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu)); + + return 1; + } + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); if (ret < 0) { vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); -- 2.29.2 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm