From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Split base and pmu registers
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 12:33:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531103344.29325-6-drjones@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531103344.29325-1-drjones@redhat.com>
Since KVM commit 11663111cd49 ("KVM: arm64: Hide PMU registers from
userspace when not available") the get-reg-list* tests have been
failing with
...
... There are 74 missing registers.
The following lines are missing registers:
...
where the 74 missing registers are all PMU registers. This isn't a
bug in KVM that the selftest found, even though it's true that a
KVM userspace that wasn't setting the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3 VCPU
flag, but still expecting the PMU registers to be in the reg-list,
would suddenly no longer have their expectations met. In that case,
the expectations were wrong, though, so that KVM userspace needs to
be fixed, and so does this selftest. The fix for this selftest is to
pull the PMU registers out of the base register sublist into their
own sublist and then create new, pmu-enabled vcpu configs which can
be tested.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
.../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 39 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index b46b8a1fdc0c..a16c8f05366c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
* The current blessed list was primed with the output of kernel version
* v4.15 with --core-reg-fixup and then later updated with new registers.
*
- * The blessed list is up to date with kernel version v5.10-rc5
+ * The blessed list is up to date with kernel version v5.13-rc3
*/
static __u64 base_regs[] = {
KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]),
@@ -829,8 +829,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 5, 2, 0), /* ESR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 6, 0, 0), /* FAR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 7, 4, 0), /* PAR_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 1), /* PMINTENSET_EL1 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 2), /* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 2, 0), /* MAIR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 10, 3, 0), /* AMAIR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 12, 0, 0), /* VBAR_EL1 */
@@ -839,6 +837,16 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 13, 0, 4), /* TPIDR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 14, 1, 0), /* CNTKCTL_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 2, 0, 0, 0), /* CSSELR_EL1 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 2), /* TPIDR_EL0 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 3), /* TPIDRRO_EL0 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 3, 0, 0), /* DACR32_EL2 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 0, 1), /* IFSR32_EL2 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 3, 0), /* FPEXC32_EL2 */
+};
+
+static __u64 pmu_regs[] = {
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 1), /* PMINTENSET_EL1 */
+ ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 9, 14, 2), /* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 0), /* PMCR_EL0 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 1), /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 12, 2), /* PMCNTENCLR_EL0 */
@@ -848,8 +856,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 13, 0), /* PMCCNTR_EL0 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 14, 0), /* PMUSERENR_EL0 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 9, 14, 3), /* PMOVSSET_EL0 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 2), /* TPIDR_EL0 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 13, 0, 3), /* TPIDRRO_EL0 */
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 0),
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 1),
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 8, 2),
@@ -913,9 +919,6 @@ static __u64 base_regs[] = {
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 5),
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 6),
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 15, 7), /* PMCCFILTR_EL0 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 3, 0, 0), /* DACR32_EL2 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 0, 1), /* IFSR32_EL2 */
- ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 4, 5, 3, 0), /* FPEXC32_EL2 */
};
static __u64 vregs[] = {
@@ -1015,6 +1018,8 @@ static __u64 sve_rejects_set[] = {
{ "base", .regs = base_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(base_regs), }
#define VREGS_SUBLIST \
{ "vregs", .regs = vregs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vregs), }
+#define PMU_SUBLIST \
+ { "pmu", .regs = pmu_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(pmu_regs), }
#define SVE_SUBLIST \
{ "sve", .capability = KVM_CAP_ARM_SVE, .feature = KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE, .finalize = true, \
.regs = sve_regs, .regs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(sve_regs), \
@@ -1027,6 +1032,14 @@ static struct vcpu_config vregs_config = {
{0},
},
};
+static struct vcpu_config vregs_pmu_config = {
+ .sublists = {
+ BASE_SUBLIST,
+ VREGS_SUBLIST,
+ PMU_SUBLIST,
+ {0},
+ },
+};
static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
.sublists = {
BASE_SUBLIST,
@@ -1034,9 +1047,19 @@ static struct vcpu_config sve_config = {
{0},
},
};
+static struct vcpu_config sve_pmu_config = {
+ .sublists = {
+ BASE_SUBLIST,
+ SVE_SUBLIST,
+ PMU_SUBLIST,
+ {0},
+ },
+};
static struct vcpu_config *vcpu_configs[] = {
&vregs_config,
+ &vregs_pmu_config,
&sve_config,
+ &sve_pmu_config,
};
static int vcpu_configs_n = ARRAY_SIZE(vcpu_configs);
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-31 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 10:33 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Introduce vcpu configs Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:40 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-06-03 12:14 ` Andrew Jones
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Prepare to run multiple configs at once Andrew Jones
2021-06-02 23:56 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Provide config selection option Andrew Jones
2021-06-03 0:03 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Remove get-reg-list-sve Andrew Jones
2021-06-03 0:09 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-05-31 10:33 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-06-02 23:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: get-reg-list: Split base and pmu registers Ricardo Koller
2021-06-22 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: arm64: selftests: Fix get-reg-list Andrew Jones
2021-06-22 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-22 7:48 ` Andrew Jones
2021-06-22 7:57 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210531103344.29325-6-drjones@redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox