[PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: arm64: vgic: Be tolerant to the lack of maintenance interrupt masking

Marc Zyngier
2021-06-01T10:40:23Z

As it turns out, not all the interrupt controllers are able to
expose a vGIC maintenance interrupt that can be independently
enabled/disabled.

And to be fair, it doesn't really matter as all we require is
for the interrupt to kick us out of guest mode out way or another.

To that effect, add gic_kvm_info.no_maint_irq_mask for an interrupt
controller to advertise the lack of masking.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 8 +++++++-
include/linux/irqchip/arm-vgic-info.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 2fdb65529594..6752d084934d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -519,12 +519,15 @@ void kvm_vgic_init_cpu_hardware(void)
*/
int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void)
{
+ bool has_mask;
int ret;

if (!gic_kvm_info)
return -ENODEV;

- if (!gic_kvm_info->maint_irq) {
+ has_mask = !gic_kvm_info->no_maint_irq_mask;
+
+ if (has_mask && !gic_kvm_info->maint_irq) {
kvm_err("No vgic maintenance irq\n");
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -552,6 +555,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_hyp_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;

+ if (!has_mask)
+ return 0;
+
ret = request_percpu_irq(kvm_vgic_global_state.maint_irq,
vgic_maintenance_handler,
"vgic", kvm_get_running_vcpus());
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-vgic-info.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-vgic-info.h
index a25d4da5697d..7c0d08ebb82c 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-vgic-info.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-vgic-info.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ struct gic_kvm_info {
struct resource vcpu;
/* Interrupt number */
unsigned int maint_irq;
+ /* No interrupt mask, no need to use the above field */
+ bool no_maint_irq_mask;
/* Virtual control interface */
struct resource vctrl;
/* vlpi support */
--
2.30.2