From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1593C433F5 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B00560EE6 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:49:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1B00560EE6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBF84B0A0; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dR5djuja21hf; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECD34B10A; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E501E4B0A0 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HIuPnPC1G-2 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5FC4A49C for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631116189; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=40UFBHRGhw7kqtdgKZE841ipL5pc0UoJdYE+Qv6yqos=; b=h820ZvBQ1iARuwOK50tEmfUsB/2ll/X2P7mAltw2xnYuO1rt8+NKLfkGi/hg1R8oB/a70O 3U0NK6ndQpNh314Q8hmgDXX6i6kkWEhy1joOOwOYXuHS3+560gvdMYyjyDW9fBW6jL29bO S8iT0id4o/1WLPbXvKeQYmMjb4ARjoA= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-522-DVogTY3qNmeqhVkIjlfnQQ-1; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:49:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DVogTY3qNmeqhVkIjlfnQQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id y11-20020aa7d50b000000b003ca1ef38cf3so1321008edq.7 for ; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:49:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=40UFBHRGhw7kqtdgKZE841ipL5pc0UoJdYE+Qv6yqos=; b=PNYmXBmq57k1NKhtZar+ImeEBpZxBwPMW4EKWwsLmWdTFyz3Q6pIDAd0Gqwu0T5kH1 ZU1bVgM4aG1kgAb6vDUaK5y50CESeYFxCogLvbQlJI+T7cAa/UCvyEmT12eViTw3OCDH sI+EAB1j4IN0tM/1M0mxhRV4SRGoDdMCpATXQXR2zHOP8tLrtU6tHaEZVvHFRjLRpcU7 YIyCKI81Flwm77dd+tz1SbzPeFzsEzd5w0s8F8VV85gXtdsYlS4gbmf/Wb4fVP76IAAc MGHMM9bqj4gnAPGqCDMwVJK0kPZGfha3z344BU4sp9bPj3SlvQCTP+kPHGyB9Tll3WeO qIOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Xa3Iybj8aiHm81wqayfO6034GN9Gv/wLw242AwWvF6y3eexoP 4zNnzBKgnFx4tmQWjCeqzshcIvpFEzER1XOn/KoqErPh1Y0XixRLiA+gBpI0LQNCD7fbs9aaWC2 mL5hunw93/BiPZPkMaJP2vdfS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b052:: with SMTP id bj18mr546489ejb.55.1631116187168; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:49:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXu4ZttkpvQjuCVBMIYjCKsZn9H35dFZn58PHwzeCurWJGXZpuFqkrf66aLT/CwHYOOp5Rdw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b052:: with SMTP id bj18mr546467ejb.55.1631116186921; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gator (cst2-174-132.cust.vodafone.cz. [31.30.174.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t16sm1226386ejj.54.2021.09.08.08.49.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Sep 2021 08:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:49:43 +0200 From: Andrew Jones To: Alexandru Elisei Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests RFC PATCH 3/5] run_tests.sh: Add kvmtool support Message-ID: <20210908154943.z7d6bhww3pnbaftd@gator> References: <20210702163122.96110-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> <20210702163122.96110-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> <20210907101730.trnsig2j4jmhinyu@gator> <587a5f8c-cf04-59ec-7e35-4ca6adf87862@arm.com> <20210908150912.3d57akqkfux4fahj@gator> <56289c06-04ec-1772-6e15-98d02780876d@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56289c06-04ec-1772-6e15-98d02780876d@arm.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=drjones@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, andre.przywara@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, vivek.gautam@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 04:46:19PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > Hi Drew, > > On 9/8/21 4:09 PM, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:33:19PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > ... > >>>> +fixup_kvmtool_opts() > >>>> +{ > >>>> + local opts=$1 > >>>> + local groups=$2 > >>>> + local gic > >>>> + local gic_version > >>>> + > >>>> + if find_word "pmu" $groups; then > >>>> + opts+=" --pmu" > >>>> + fi > >>>> + > >>>> + if find_word "its" $groups; then > >>>> + gic_version=3 > >>>> + gic="gicv3-its" > >>>> + elif [[ "$opts" =~ -machine\ *gic-version=(2|3) ]]; then > >>>> + gic_version="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}" > >>>> + gic="gicv$gic_version" > >>>> + fi > >>>> + > >>>> + if [ -n "$gic" ]; then > >>>> + opts=${opts/-machine gic-version=$gic_version/} > >>>> + opts+=" --irqchip=$gic" > >>>> + fi > >>>> + > >>>> + opts=${opts/-append/--params} > >>>> + > >>>> + echo "$opts" > >>>> +} > >>> Hmm, I don't think we want to write a QEMU parameter translator for > >>> all other VMMs, and all other VMM architectures, that we want to > >>> support. I think we should add new "extra_params" variables to the > >>> unittest configuration instead, e.g. "kvmtool_params", where the > >>> extra parameters can be listed correctly and explicitly. While at > >>> it, I would create an alias for "extra_params", which would be > >>> "qemu_params" allowing unittests that support more than one VMM > >>> to clearly show what's what. > >> I agree, this is a much better idea than a parameter translator. Using a dedicated > >> variable in unittests.cfg will make it easier for new tests to get support for all > >> VMMs (for example, writing a list of parameters in unittests.cfg should be easier > >> than digging through the scripts to figure exactly how and where to add a > >> translation for a new parameter), and it allow us to express parameters for other > >> VMMs which don't have a direct correspondent in qemu. > >> > >> By creating an alias, do you mean replacing extra_params with qemu_params in > >> arm/unittests.cfg? Or something else? > > Probably something like this > > > > diff --git a/scripts/common.bash b/scripts/common.bash > > index 7b983f7d6dd6..e5119ff216e5 100644 > > --- a/scripts/common.bash > > +++ b/scripts/common.bash > > @@ -37,7 +37,12 @@ function for_each_unittest() > > elif [[ $line =~ ^smp\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > smp=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > elif [[ $line =~ ^extra_params\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > - opts=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > + elif [[ $line =~ ^extra_params\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > + qemu_opts=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > + elif [[ $line =~ ^qemu_params\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > + qemu_opts=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > + elif [[ $line =~ ^kvmtool_params\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > + kvmtool_opts=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > elif [[ $line =~ ^groups\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > groups=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} > > elif [[ $line =~ ^arch\ *=\ *(.*)$ ]]; then > > > > and all other changes needed to support the s/opts/qemu_opts/ change > > should work. Also, an addition to the unittests.cfg documentation. > > Got it, replace extra_opts with qemu_opts in the scripts. > > Yes, the documentation for unittests.cfg (at the top of the file) should > definitely be updated to document the new configuration option, kvmtool_params. > > > > > The above diff doesn't consider that a unittests.cfg file could have > > both an 'extra_params' and a 'qemu_params' field, but I'm not sure > > we care about that. Users should read the documentation and we > > should review changes to the committed unittests.cfg files to avoid > > that. > > What do you feel about renaming extra_params -> qemu_params in unittests.cfg? Yes, that's what I would expect the patch to do. > I'm > thinking it would make the usage clearer, improve consistency (we would have > qemu_params and kvmtool_params, instead of extra_params and kvmtool_params), and > remove any confusions regarding when they are used (I can see someone thinking > that extra_params are used all the time, and are appended to kvmtool_params when > --target=kvmtool). On the other hand, this could be problematic for people using > out-of-tree scripts that parse the unittest.cfg file for whatever reason (are > there people that do that?). I'm not as worried about that as about people using out-of-tree unittests.cfg files that will break when the 'extra_params' field disappears. That's why I suggested to make 'extra_params' an alias. Thanks, drew > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > > Thanks, > > drew > > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm