From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07BC433F5 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FC461265 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 00:55:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 24FC461265 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13A54B133; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFZvsJlOYl6c; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6131B4B152; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B2B4B12C for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r18mIgBipmxt for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-qk1-f202.google.com (mail-qk1-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600624B136 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk1-f202.google.com with SMTP id s18-20020a05620a255200b00433885d4fa7so44984737qko.4 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:from:to:cc; bh=wCDTOmCATHVhirkJj1e9UGRNdETjcfm809lLJpA1KZ0=; b=NqlSHtDJsZY9ynz1iazGvEiDMeqk04glWuzCtUdaZ74/+oO9rjnWS76Uh5TCi8grB+ KwboA6njeSjTV+7uoE02X2FwYEkNPrLAm4qkXIZRVzJuxFafx32Mk5Xow/7WaARh1YAZ aC51w8eW6QKpvfDfIdD1udB75TJ4xUgQM915d2jcceUTh/hDb7mbGAiLnwAyqt0Y+WNF QpBy7FR47VOdDUwc186Fr9j28eODhANC/CUAjZvNZrR7fGsZs3zQzKM9xL4iXSTKlTtT +D4Y310QHpvHJHW02qI33BojoXY3YB8cjH1EF1eQmiciixtCRe97iPAZe1mITqWJtBmk YH1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=wCDTOmCATHVhirkJj1e9UGRNdETjcfm809lLJpA1KZ0=; b=uT4ZvQEPSufgarZjD75WsRp2OuJh6i7rrgFyBZAiK1zIhHSVCnLN5c14tFpDFCY4WZ VRfY8uR8W9Kn2ZMfIxUidugpoOXHaorFultPHzvjNSyBeAldsjOPgMAiqjshFbDZwPKm ZTWousmeiskb7OkuTCgUeg0pQWxW1FL2jdnQLD9VswEi98wdLuizrJhETxhZ2WRFay89 hDnq9XG/fn73DSWliEDcD4fTijydKt9iIuI4Zuq5V1cTmJDXJCL0YDWM1QKOP697D2GE LQVQtDK3hduGY77QuHP6hN/bQm8PVat24Fi5VZv1MMr/X5kuW4367jZDR2XqdJuVV3LW a+JQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zzHwbCJ72KQ32pZeLOPYiqO1szVkqoq9pDEdYJxgYbhsZ5lOI T4YV8sZbqxrGBnVDIPpbvgl4TVC6dyA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAe8cto2GGuy35+RfGF59+NomWHsqVgBAWIRGsvWVII07cOgInTsUOlV2E2ha1qSQ9QAXX81/NXqE= X-Received: from seanjc798194.pdx.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:90:200:4c72:89be:dba3:2bcb]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6214:1046:: with SMTP id l6mr4932886qvr.6.1632531346015; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:55:21 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20210925005528.1145584-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210925005528.1145584-8-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210925005528.1145584-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog Subject: [PATCH 07/14] KVM: Don't block+unblock when halt-polling is successful From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Joerg Roedel , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, David Matlack , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jim Mattson X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean Christopherson List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Invoke the arch hooks for block+unblock if and only if KVM actually attempts to block the vCPU. The only non-nop implementation is on arm64, and if halt-polling is successful, there is no need for arm64 to put/load the vGIC as KVM hasn't relinquished control of the vCPU in any way. The primary motivation is to allow future cleanup to split out "block" from "halt", but this is also likely a small performance boost on arm64 when halt-polling is successful. Adjust the post-block path to update "cur" after unblocking, i.e. include vGIC load time in halt_wait_ns and halt_wait_hist, so that the behavior is consistent. Moving just the pre-block arch hook would result in only the vGIC put latency being included in the halt_wait stats. There is no obvious evidence that one way or the other is correct, so just ensure KVM is consistent. Cc: Marc Zyngier Cc: James Morse Cc: Alexandru Elisei Cc: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 2015a1f532ce..f96cda8312f3 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -3232,8 +3232,6 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) bool waited = false; u64 block_ns; - kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(vcpu); - start = cur = poll_end = ktime_get(); if (do_halt_poll) { ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), vcpu->halt_poll_ns); @@ -3250,6 +3248,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) } while (kvm_vcpu_can_poll(cur, stop)); } + kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(vcpu); prepare_to_rcuwait(&vcpu->wait); for (;;) { @@ -3262,6 +3261,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) schedule(); } finish_rcuwait(&vcpu->wait); + + kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu); + cur = ktime_get(); if (waited) { vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_ns += @@ -3269,8 +3271,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) KVM_STATS_LOG_HIST_UPDATE(vcpu->stat.generic.halt_wait_hist, ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(poll_end)); } + out: - kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu); block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start); /* -- 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm