From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1287C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 02:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803F061038 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 02:14:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 803F061038 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ABD4B1BF; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNvY6+E4qzCx; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260A94B1BC; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150924B1B5 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SoDOYbBa628X for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-yb1-f201.google.com (mail-yb1-f201.google.com [209.85.219.201]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEB34B199 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:14:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f201.google.com with SMTP id z130-20020a256588000000b005b6b4594129so15101150ybb.15 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:14:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:from:to:cc; bh=6xwGp+yCPRNZeLMFXXBjBMcyDDhJc3kOdh7+GdwoBtU=; b=O3uyycCB0m4rETPo/2EXg7KzDS0Kxxd5QSMOgN5++pIlRXIKx8d0yrsAd7IRsknDXU jfPpfSaBpR+vzVZLfe2k/aYazJeb1V2OYVJeM9zHGQGZhxYlUVKxD+cBCI62fGJRZVEl yp3sVQ08Q330CkbJTchqmDuBifPyeL6Ww3QjU3eQOha0KDm0IBJuDzOMnyesSyo+q+I/ lJ8xG8ZB8d3AYNpLPtB4eWA/pyqYaGmh5tBZ/8rId9AshkSUfwuM0AAs41HY+kSD+IsV W4/ngk/MxUvX4B342qXh08T69yL8VAymitYL9u6x/enfR2SkDRVs3Yd1g27SdUPXsZPn 0GRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=6xwGp+yCPRNZeLMFXXBjBMcyDDhJc3kOdh7+GdwoBtU=; b=8Odi2119LWpR0wcX/ltQwIbZoHl+TGr3pCWTjKsaLV0T1xr+E0Ks5Y4XV0w0ZjzN+G 9j68iMzMBoOl/omD5YM3fgUgpPOuJufCbemfsIdfSzNP3sAYiHDHGplbGONo4I4HXSZ/ cSTt3UwVemt820rYJGMj8IFurwB2XyLbqQ4zNE8T2LvwSlbqYvQDfe6COd6AjPQKQDgs TSmvaAotCudBVIM2v3kkjti37Q73RBuYH+rywHKy8xYXI2d7R843kT4GT/Lh/PqbDsdx QZ65m3chgqipgvCO5LhHZQSSxOPcqeVO+7gjAj/aJcmvsagIuoRixuOxoNUA2MkGCSnN cGXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k5/CwzjWZqSUQzmqG1pDNnL20SAEaysuDyRE57m+AkT83H3NG JLRYUth0tTVR9I4CLXaOA++ozVf3TYw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGMQ2uf1Tp63zXiZ9a6+eAt9/mXxTl51gnqbi9PaWar+CNyJX66rPwqvsO9Gv4EvKTMkdMfFkjiGQ= X-Received: from seanjc798194.pdx.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:90:200:e39b:6333:b001:cb]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6902:154f:: with SMTP id r15mr8259463ybu.379.1633745650411; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 19:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 19:12:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20211009021236.4122790-37-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211009021236.4122790-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 36/43] KVM: SVM: Don't bother checking for "running" AVIC when kicking for IPIs From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Claudio Imbrenda , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Joerg Roedel , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean Christopherson List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Drop the avic_vcpu_is_running() check when waking vCPUs in response to a VM-Exit due to incomplete IPI delivery. The check isn't wrong per se, but it's not 100% accurate in the sense that it doesn't guarantee that the vCPU was one of the vCPUs that didn't receive the IPI. The check isn't required for correctness as blocking == !running in this context. >From a performance perspective, waking a live task is not expensive as the only moderately costly operation is a locked operation to temporarily disable preemption. And if that is indeed a performance issue, kvm_vcpu_is_blocking() would be a better check than poking into the AVIC. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 15 +++++++++------ arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 11 ----------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c index cbf02e7e20d0..b43b05610ade 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c @@ -295,13 +295,16 @@ static void avic_kick_target_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; int i; + /* + * Wake any target vCPUs that are blocking, i.e. waiting for a wake + * event. There's no need to signal doorbells, as hardware has handled + * vCPUs that were in guest at the time of the IPI, and vCPUs that have + * since entered the guest will have processed pending IRQs at VMRUN. + */ kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { - bool m = kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, source, - icrl & APIC_SHORT_MASK, - GET_APIC_DEST_FIELD(icrh), - icrl & APIC_DEST_MASK); - - if (m && !avic_vcpu_is_running(vcpu)) + if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, source, icrl & APIC_SHORT_MASK, + GET_APIC_DEST_FIELD(icrh), + icrl & APIC_DEST_MASK)) kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu); } } diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h index 0d7bbe548ac3..7f5b01bbee29 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h @@ -509,17 +509,6 @@ extern struct kvm_x86_nested_ops svm_nested_ops; #define VMCB_AVIC_APIC_BAR_MASK 0xFFFFFFFFFF000ULL -static inline bool avic_vcpu_is_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); - u64 *entry = svm->avic_physical_id_cache; - - if (!entry) - return false; - - return (READ_ONCE(*entry) & AVIC_PHYSICAL_ID_ENTRY_IS_RUNNING_MASK); -} - int avic_ga_log_notifier(u32 ga_tag); void avic_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm); int avic_vm_init(struct kvm *kvm); -- 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm