From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5ACFC433FE for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 06:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9159E61178 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 06:28:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 9159E61178 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC694B0F5; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXdWWIdZsikg; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1404B11C; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138D04B090 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IRbVEB9QmcFb for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-pf1-f201.google.com (mail-pf1-f201.google.com [209.85.210.201]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 935914B10A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:28:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f201.google.com with SMTP id c140-20020a624e92000000b0044d3de98438so823032pfb.14 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 23:28:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=62b24VOqm1GyPCwAwjAOsxxDMNGj6sMpkNWOp6uvxsM=; b=XlbO25p2CIQboATiZM796LS9XynMuq0GihpUcYOZrTmQhvJzRJ2W/kjCoQLkW092ux iZwcnroXhOVlOrNpwyjrb4W7FhkK+5ur3AYKTrsIPhlnANtJ2ggQfqeJ8k3knJ5xm8NQ XQLwJckKsME0PRvn7JU9p+y1maCsQ7z4k+gRpL5u6lRaNtaEz9LsTgchiiQAf5AMGsZI oxxvN08C1a91mRWJHpn1VtdIZfTpqaIxzUk+dJP+qAHWgqq9gX7AdZ4Mm6fiVtJvSyJF zihzYRwoZJrmBgPEAhtAPegRJl3TYI2CLuDPM/yTxxZJwFHwrvNP0aeFRqM9Yg8gJzpy lMgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=62b24VOqm1GyPCwAwjAOsxxDMNGj6sMpkNWOp6uvxsM=; b=B0wSqhMD+cgGi300GDsf7rFGjSInpR740Zo6KTY7PLx5gjdGc/SiES0h/fVvR2TLpD SyhlJlEVsIUhL0aIRbQzDaMIJTAIrQr5PBfoVLBZ+Z5NvgpETaFvWknv93lEG1xY5f1v uchvHdRxW4iSfiYmafSV2tQpoc/np6zS3Np14SMuxT33YgjAFtMd8YP6Ja52HDaywuOx gLPU9JoNtqFf9x+aBkGFDWNlIYhweVutrYmDcvqzWwAwiZPKkggwSJN6w4ImZtLSKFB7 kSTEax6mUCbpaRgCQ4LTcojGgh+Z94yQwTWwZMUPNqWEyZynKzL+lujUcZNE+EVRtN0q 23cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531c1IFKlP8eXnSIYgGUYHNmS3qqUmFo9yZWHU2oE0Ue9TZI1L33 YjbAJ0MfmVwYaXJkU8GcyNOUSqRr6Dg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGvMyBr7tNE7aE91Wbj2mvX+2vJq4YTKJKizdjI2txUHQhqgC4yVAz0wHp3y/dUFG7WJDfQgKWMXI= X-Received: from reiji-vws-sp.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3d59]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6a00:b83:b0:47b:fbb3:9265 with SMTP id g3-20020a056a000b8300b0047bfbb39265mr41424784pfj.79.1635920887811; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 23:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 23:25:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20211103062520.1445832-1-reijiw@google.com> Message-Id: <20211103062520.1445832-9-reijiw@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211103062520.1445832-1-reijiw@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/28] KVM: arm64: Make ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 writable From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Peter Shier , Paolo Bonzini , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu This patch adds id_reg_info for ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 to make it writable by userspace. Return an error if userspace tries to set PTRAUTH related fields of the register to values that conflict with PTRAUTH configuration, which was configured by KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT, for the guest. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 7f505853b569..83b05d37afbd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -356,6 +356,24 @@ static int arm64_check_features(u64 check_types, u64 val, u64 lim) return 0; } +#define PTRAUTH_MASK (ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) | \ + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_API) | \ + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA) | \ + ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI)) + +#define aa64isar1_has_apa(val) \ + (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT) >= \ + ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_ARCHITECTED) +#define aa64isar1_has_api(val) \ + (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT) >= \ + ID_AA64ISAR1_API_IMP_DEF) +#define aa64isar1_has_gpa(val) \ + (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA_SHIFT) >= \ + ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA_ARCHITECTED) +#define aa64isar1_has_gpi(val) \ + (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_SHIFT) >= \ + ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_IMP_DEF) + struct id_reg_info { u32 sys_reg; /* Register ID */ @@ -460,6 +478,36 @@ static int validate_id_aa64isar0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return 0; } +static int validate_id_aa64isar1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg, u64 val) +{ + bool has_gpi, has_gpa, has_api, has_apa; + bool generic, address; + + has_gpi = aa64isar1_has_gpi(val); + has_gpa = aa64isar1_has_gpa(val); + has_api = aa64isar1_has_api(val); + has_apa = aa64isar1_has_apa(val); + if ((has_gpi && has_gpa) || (has_api && has_apa)) + return -EINVAL; + + generic = has_gpi || has_gpa; + address = has_api || has_apa; + /* + * Since the current KVM guest implementation works by enabling + * both address/generic pointer authentication features, + * return an error if they conflict. + */ + if (generic ^ address) + return -EPERM; + + /* Check if there is a conflict with a request via KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT */ + if (vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) ^ (generic && address)) + return -EPERM; + + return 0; +} + static void init_id_aa64pfr0_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) { u64 limit = id_reg->vcpu_limit_val; @@ -490,6 +538,12 @@ static void init_id_aa64pfr1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE); } +static void init_id_aa64isar1_el1_info(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) +{ + if (!system_has_full_ptr_auth()) + id_reg->vcpu_limit_val &= ~PTRAUTH_MASK; +} + static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct id_reg_info *idr) { @@ -506,6 +560,13 @@ static u64 get_reset_id_aa64pfr1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR1_MTE))); } +static u64 get_reset_id_aa64isar1_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *idr) +{ + return vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) ? + idr->vcpu_limit_val : (idr->vcpu_limit_val & ~PTRAUTH_MASK); +} + static struct id_reg_info id_aa64pfr0_el1_info = { .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, .ftr_check_types = S_FCT(ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, FCT_LOWER_SAFE) | @@ -530,6 +591,16 @@ static struct id_reg_info id_aa64isar0_el1_info = { .validate = validate_id_aa64isar0_el1, }; +static struct id_reg_info id_aa64isar1_el1_info = { + .sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1, + .ftr_check_types = + U_FCT(ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT, FCT_EXACT_OR_ZERO_SAFE) | + U_FCT(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT, FCT_EXACT_OR_ZERO_SAFE), + .init = init_id_aa64isar1_el1_info, + .validate = validate_id_aa64isar1_el1, + .get_reset_val = get_reset_id_aa64isar1_el1, +}; + /* * An ID register that needs special handling to control the value for the * guest must have its own id_reg_info in id_reg_info_table. @@ -542,6 +613,7 @@ static struct id_reg_info *id_reg_info_table[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_MAX_NUM] = { [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr0_el1_info, [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64pfr1_el1_info, [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1)] = &id_aa64isar0_el1_info, + [IDREG_IDX(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1)] = &id_aa64isar1_el1_info, }; static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@ -1376,13 +1448,6 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val = raz ? 0 : __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, IDREG_SYS_IDX(id)); switch (id) { - case SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1: - if (!vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) - val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_APA) | - ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_API) | - ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA) | - ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI)); - break; case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1: /* Limit debug to ARMv8.0 */ val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER); -- 2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm