From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF74CC4332F for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 00:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6335B611ED for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 00:26:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6335B611ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AAB4B1A3; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qshJSZrZ7o2D; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930354B159; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6FD4A3A5 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upGMeDZFC6Jy for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com (mail-pl1-f202.google.com [209.85.214.202]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3644B13E for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:26:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id k9-20020a170902ba8900b00141f601d5c8so1957238pls.1 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 17:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:from:to:cc; bh=Rh/p9dCBzSE6gfhoLM6qA42nAbGkMHfvz+ihOHus8Bw=; b=a0LysDSixF+SvGFoYJAn+9lReuNdeuojzCYwE/5S80HnosejUJ/GB5lSTi0I0B6etw PCesr77PK5UoG4qbBnDDmbOplfKjJvN0RSVwwsJ9A6TMfI9nydou7MxD9T7lOeaglEHG XNiJ9e6EtswDVfj8NbPNGs3K4UVClUfWt61l+WfszqPbkc9k/eRztWPGJiIa05+786xW gJ3qi2D5CO9qdvRG06/gp2Sn2Z2tyJIgyiWYmMzoSHEsDwT7XcmXrmm49tOMjj1utuxC 5Wr/o1J29XTmPql9v7HTGvlM7g8HATHgYxp+e4CAJr75tfOZ82uzZSP74HenxJ6CsJu8 wJFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Rh/p9dCBzSE6gfhoLM6qA42nAbGkMHfvz+ihOHus8Bw=; b=tXecGc79qjdWrBSGOHm1pJy0EcRD4A2uPzRXrcNOe4q/AfB8rZWYI526skWwM1v+FG jgN8cyG7w03kpiRTIXmJVxxmFLiFBZ+ngzv3Q3f5xTSRNbRPaUsjA49sXyQHX3GVauqe wAClfP9Xy2VAywMTl83mf+s6tBcG5lebMkej64QV3nV+vXyZJfDIyZb2NL+bbJJSWMFb 9Qbq53V122naU5q9jztow3u2haVFXSy4zLuzI0qIYPXAePvH44awhC+AiC4jy2OX+BbF KOQaKcIHT3gavC5udB4DMB9O2FBsbnvoatw84kANMQNcX3EPJkkpHawI6lShtoi1LEEH wE6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532myTj1VO+TB08HIx6uXbOGZIBfrGMbF96n8GqSl22Kqfqm/wv9 icjpV90+YPFxFx9bUTc7ubzRLFvPS28= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOWq98exFdSMvxgt0VGjIuS13MnOJ47QLgbIC6Hkpi6D0S+Boi55mGWksr+QgQdfajOLURjR0xq4c= X-Received: from seanjc.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3e5]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:e8d1:b0:141:de15:f596 with SMTP id v17-20020a170902e8d100b00141de15f596mr25033911plg.67.1635985585858; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 17:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 00:25:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20211104002531.1176691-1-seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20211104002531.1176691-17-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211104002531.1176691-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog Subject: [PATCH v5.5 16/30] KVM: x86: Don't assume old/new memslots are non-NULL at memslot commit From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Paul Mackerras , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Wanpeng Li , kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , Ben Gardon , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Claudio Imbrenda , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Joerg Roedel , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jim Mattson , Cornelia Huck , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean Christopherson List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Play nice with a NULL @old or @new when handling memslot updates so that common KVM can pass NULL for one or the other in CREATE and DELETE cases instead of having to synthesize a dummy memslot. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 80e726f73dd7..80183f7eadeb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -11762,13 +11762,15 @@ static void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags(struct kvm *kvm, const struct kvm_memory_slot *new, enum kvm_mr_change change) { - bool log_dirty_pages = new->flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES; + u32 old_flags = old ? old->flags : 0; + u32 new_flags = new ? new->flags : 0; + bool log_dirty_pages = new_flags & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES; /* * Update CPU dirty logging if dirty logging is being toggled. This * applies to all operations. */ - if ((old->flags ^ new->flags) & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) + if ((old_flags ^ new_flags) & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES) kvm_mmu_update_cpu_dirty_logging(kvm, log_dirty_pages); /* @@ -11786,7 +11788,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags(struct kvm *kvm, * MOVE/DELETE: The old mappings will already have been cleaned up by * kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(). */ - if ((change != KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY) || (new->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY)) + if ((change != KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY) || (new_flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY)) return; /* @@ -11794,7 +11796,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags(struct kvm *kvm, * other flag is LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, i.e. something is wrong if dirty * logging isn't being toggled on or off. */ - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!((old->flags ^ new->flags) & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES))) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!((old_flags ^ new_flags) & KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES))) return; if (!log_dirty_pages) { -- 2.33.1.1089.g2158813163f-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm