From: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: mixed-width check should be skipped for uninitialized vCPUs
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 21:40:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220110054042.1079932-1-reijiw@google.com> (raw)
vcpu_allowed_register_width() checks if all the VCPUs are either
all 32bit or all 64bit. Since the checking is done even for vCPUs
that are not initialized (KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT has not been done) yet,
the non-initialized vCPUs are erroneously treated as 64bit vCPU,
which causes the function to incorrectly detect a mixed-width VM.
Fix vcpu_allowed_register_width() to skip the check for vCPUs that
are not initialized yet.
Fixes: 66e94d5cafd4 ("KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation")
Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 426bd7fbc3fd..ef78bbc7566a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -180,8 +180,19 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit)
return false;
+ /*
+ * Make sure vcpu->arch.target setting is visible from others so
+ * that the width consistency checking between two vCPUs is done
+ * by at least one of them at KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+
/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
+ /* Skip if KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT is not done for the vcpu yet */
+ if (tmp->arch.target == -1)
+ continue;
+
if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
return false;
}
base-commit: df0cc57e057f18e44dac8e6c18aba47ab53202f9
--
2.34.1.575.g55b058a8bb-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-10 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 5:40 Reiji Watanabe [this message]
2022-01-10 5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Introduce vcpu_width_config Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-11 9:47 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-10 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: mixed-width check should be skipped for uninitialized vCPUs Alexandru Elisei
2022-01-11 7:37 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-01-11 13:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 16:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-01-13 5:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220110054042.1079932-1-reijiw@google.com \
--to=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox