Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 67/89] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 entry/exit handlers for pKVM guests
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:41:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519134204.5379-68-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519134204.5379-1-will@kernel.org>

From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>

Introduce separate El2 entry/exit handlers for protected and
non-protected guests under pKVM and hook up the protected handlers to
expose the minimum amount of data to the host required for EL1 handling.

Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 228 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
index e987f34641dd..692576497ed9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 
+#include "../../sys_regs.h"
+
 /*
  * Host FPSIMD state. Written to when the guest accesses its own FPSIMD state,
  * and read when the guest state is live and we need to switch back to the host.
@@ -34,6 +36,207 @@ void __kvm_hyp_host_forward_smc(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt);
 
 typedef void (*shadow_entry_exit_handler_fn)(struct kvm_vcpu *, struct kvm_vcpu *);
 
+static void handle_pvm_entry_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.flags) &
+				   KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_entry_sys64(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long host_flags;
+
+	host_flags = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.flags);
+
+	/* Exceptions have priority on anything else */
+	if (host_flags & KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION) {
+		/* Exceptions caused by this should be undef exceptions. */
+		u32 esr = (ESR_ELx_EC_UNKNOWN << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT);
+
+		__vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, ESR_EL1) = esr;
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					     KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK);
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC |
+					    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1);
+
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (host_flags & KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC) {
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					     KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK);
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
+	}
+
+	if (!esr_sys64_to_params(shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2).is_write) {
+		/* r0 as transfer register between the guest and the host. */
+		u64 rt_val = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[0]);
+		int rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(shadow_vcpu);
+
+		vcpu_set_reg(shadow_vcpu, rt, rt_val);
+	}
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_entry_iabt(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long cpsr = *vcpu_cpsr(shadow_vcpu);
+	unsigned long host_flags;
+	u32 esr = ESR_ELx_IL;
+
+	host_flags = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.flags);
+
+	if (!(host_flags & KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the host wants to inject an exception, get syndrom and
+	 * fault address.
+	 */
+	if ((cpsr & PSR_MODE_MASK) == PSR_MODE_EL0t)
+		esr |= (ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT);
+	else
+		esr |= (ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_CUR << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT);
+
+	esr |= ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT;
+
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, ESR_EL1) = esr;
+	__vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, FAR_EL1) = kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(shadow_vcpu);
+
+	/* Tell the run loop that we want to inject something */
+	shadow_vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+				     KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK);
+	shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+				    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC |
+				    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1);
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_entry_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	unsigned long host_flags;
+	bool rd_update;
+
+	host_flags = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.flags);
+
+	/* Exceptions have priority over anything else */
+	if (host_flags & KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION) {
+		unsigned long cpsr = *vcpu_cpsr(shadow_vcpu);
+		u32 esr = ESR_ELx_IL;
+
+		if ((cpsr & PSR_MODE_MASK) == PSR_MODE_EL0t)
+			esr |= (ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT);
+		else
+			esr |= (ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_CUR << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT);
+
+		esr |= ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT;
+
+		__vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, ESR_EL1) = esr;
+		__vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, FAR_EL1) = kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(shadow_vcpu);
+		/* Tell the run loop that we want to inject something */
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					     KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK);
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC |
+					    KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1);
+
+		/* Cancel potential in-flight MMIO */
+		shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed = false;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Handle PC increment on MMIO */
+	if ((host_flags & KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC) && shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed) {
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags &= ~(KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION |
+					     KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_MASK);
+		shadow_vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
+	}
+
+	/* If we were doing an MMIO read access, update the register*/
+	rd_update = (shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed &&
+		     (host_flags & KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC));
+	rd_update &= !kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(shadow_vcpu);
+
+	if (rd_update) {
+		/* r0 as transfer register between the guest and the host. */
+		u64 rd_val = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[0]);
+		int rd = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(shadow_vcpu);
+
+		vcpu_set_reg(shadow_vcpu, rd, rd_val);
+	}
+
+	shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed = false;
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_exit_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate & PSR_MODE_MASK);
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_exit_sys64(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	u32 esr_el2 = shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2;
+
+	/* r0 as transfer register between the guest and the host. */
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+		   esr_el2 & ~ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_RT_MASK);
+
+	/* The mode is required for the host to emulate some sysregs */
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate & PSR_MODE_MASK);
+
+	if (esr_sys64_to_params(esr_el2).is_write) {
+		int rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(shadow_vcpu);
+		u64 rt_val = vcpu_get_reg(shadow_vcpu, rt);
+
+		WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[0], rt_val);
+	}
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_exit_iabt(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2);
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2);
+}
+
+static void handle_pvm_exit_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
+{
+	/*
+	 * For now, we treat all data aborts as MMIO since we have no knowledge
+	 * of the memslot configuration at EL2.
+	 */
+	shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed = true;
+
+	if (shadow_vcpu->mmio_needed) {
+		/* r0 as transfer register between the guest and the host. */
+		WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+			   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 & ~ESR_ELx_SRT_MASK);
+
+		if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(shadow_vcpu)) {
+			int rt = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(shadow_vcpu);
+			u64 rt_val = vcpu_get_reg(shadow_vcpu, rt);
+
+			WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.regs[0], rt_val);
+		}
+	} else {
+		WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2,
+			   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 & ~ESR_ELx_ISV);
+	}
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.ctxt.regs.pstate & PSR_MODE_MASK);
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.far_el2,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.far_el2 & GENMASK(11, 0));
+	WRITE_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2,
+		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.hpfar_el2);
+	WRITE_ONCE(__vcpu_sys_reg(host_vcpu, SCTLR_EL1),
+		   __vcpu_sys_reg(shadow_vcpu, SCTLR_EL1) & (SCTLR_ELx_EE | SCTLR_EL1_E0E));
+}
+
 static void handle_vm_entry_generic(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shadow_vcpu)
 {
 	unsigned long host_flags = READ_ONCE(host_vcpu->arch.flags);
@@ -67,6 +270,22 @@ static void handle_vm_exit_abt(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu, struct kvm_vcpu *shad
 		   shadow_vcpu->arch.fault.disr_el1);
 }
 
+static const shadow_entry_exit_handler_fn entry_pvm_shadow_handlers[] = {
+	[0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]		= NULL,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_WFx]		= handle_pvm_entry_wfx,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= handle_pvm_entry_sys64,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW]		= handle_pvm_entry_iabt,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW]		= handle_pvm_entry_dabt,
+};
+
+static const shadow_entry_exit_handler_fn exit_pvm_shadow_handlers[] = {
+	[0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]		= NULL,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_WFx]		= handle_pvm_exit_wfx,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64]		= handle_pvm_exit_sys64,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_IABT_LOW]		= handle_pvm_exit_iabt,
+	[ESR_ELx_EC_DABT_LOW]		= handle_pvm_exit_dabt,
+};
+
 static const shadow_entry_exit_handler_fn entry_vm_shadow_handlers[] = {
 	[0 ... ESR_ELx_EC_MAX]		= handle_vm_entry_generic,
 };
@@ -219,9 +438,13 @@ static void flush_shadow_state(struct kvm_shadow_vcpu_state *shadow_state)
 		break;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
 		esr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(shadow_vcpu));
-		ec_handler = entry_vm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
+		if (shadow_state_is_protected(shadow_state))
+			ec_handler = entry_pvm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
+		else
+			ec_handler = entry_vm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
 		if (ec_handler)
 			ec_handler(host_vcpu, shadow_vcpu);
+
 		break;
 	default:
 		BUG();
@@ -251,7 +474,10 @@ static void sync_shadow_state(struct kvm_shadow_vcpu_state *shadow_state,
 		break;
 	case ARM_EXCEPTION_TRAP:
 		esr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(kvm_vcpu_get_esr(shadow_vcpu));
-		ec_handler = exit_vm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
+		if (shadow_state_is_protected(shadow_state))
+			ec_handler = exit_pvm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
+		else
+			ec_handler = exit_vm_shadow_handlers[esr_ec];
 		if (ec_handler)
 			ec_handler(host_vcpu, shadow_vcpu);
 		break;
-- 
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 13:40 [PATCH 00/89] KVM: arm64: Base support for the pKVM hypervisor at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 01/89] KVM: arm64: Handle all ID registers trapped for a protected VM Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 02/89] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant hyp_assert_lock_held() assertions Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 03/89] KVM: arm64: Return error from kvm_arch_init_vm() on allocation failure Will Deacon
2022-05-20 15:55   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-05-31 16:15     ` Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 04/89] KVM: arm64: Ignore 'kvm-arm.mode=protected' when using VHE Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 05/89] KVM: arm64: Extend comment in has_vhe() Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 06/89] KVM: arm64: Drop stale comment Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 07/89] KVM: arm64: Move hyp refcount manipulation helpers Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 08/89] KVM: arm64: Back hyp_vmemmap for all of memory Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 09/89] KVM: arm64: Unify identifiers used to distinguish host and hypervisor Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 10/89] KVM: arm64: Implement do_donate() helper for donating memory Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 11/89] KVM: arm64: Prevent the donation of no-map pages Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 12/89] KVM: arm64: Add helpers to pin memory shared with hyp Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 13/89] KVM: arm64: Include asm/kvm_mmu.h in nvhe/mem_protect.h Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 14/89] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_spinlock_t static initializer Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 15/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce shadow VM state at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 16/89] KVM: arm64: Instantiate VM shadow data from EL1 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 17/89] KVM: arm64: Make hyp stage-1 refcnt correct on the whole range Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 18/89] KVM: arm64: Factor out private range VA allocation Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 19/89] KVM: arm64: Add pcpu fixmap infrastructure at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 20/89] KVM: arm64: Provide I-cache invalidation by VA " Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 21/89] KVM: arm64: Allow non-coallescable pages in a hyp_pool Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 22/89] KVM: arm64: Add generic hyp_memcache helpers Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 23/89] KVM: arm64: Instantiate guest stage-2 page-tables at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:40 ` [PATCH 24/89] KVM: arm64: Return guest memory from EL2 via dedicated teardown memcache Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 25/89] KVM: arm64: Add flags to struct hyp_page Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 26/89] KVM: arm64: Provide a hypercall for the host to reclaim guest memory Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 27/89] KVM: arm64: Extend memory sharing to allow host-to-guest transitions Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 28/89] KVM: arm64: Consolidate stage-2 init in one function Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 29/89] KVM: arm64: Check for PTE validity when checking for executable/cacheable Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 30/89] KVM: arm64: Do not allow memslot changes after first VM run under pKVM Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 31/89] KVM: arm64: Disallow dirty logging and RO memslots with pKVM Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 32/89] KVM: arm64: Use the shadow vCPU structure in handle___kvm_vcpu_run() Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 33/89] KVM: arm64: Handle guest stage-2 page-tables entirely at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-20 16:03   ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-05-31 16:45     ` Will Deacon
2022-06-08  1:16       ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-07-27  9:59         ` Alexandru Elisei
2022-07-28  6:50           ` Huang, Shaoqin
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 34/89] KVM: arm64: Don't access kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base at EL1 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 35/89] KVM: arm64: Unmap kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base from the host Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 36/89] KVM: arm64: Maintain a copy of 'kvm_arm_vmid_bits' at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 37/89] KVM: arm64: Explicitly map kvm_vgic_global_state " Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 38/89] KVM: arm64: Don't map host sections in pkvm Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 39/89] KVM: arm64: Extend memory donation to allow host-to-guest transitions Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 40/89] KVM: arm64: Split up nvhe/fixed_config.h Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 41/89] KVM: arm64: Make vcpu_{read, write}_sys_reg available to HYP code Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 42/89] KVM: arm64: Simplify vgic-v3 hypercalls Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 43/89] KVM: arm64: Add the {flush, sync}_vgic_state() primitives Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 44/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce predicates to check for protected state Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 45/89] KVM: arm64: Add the {flush, sync}_timer_state() primitives Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 46/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce the pkvm_vcpu_{load, put} hypercalls Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 47/89] KVM: arm64: Add current vcpu and shadow_state lookup primitive Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 48/89] KVM: arm64: Skip __kvm_adjust_pc() for protected vcpus Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 49/89] KVM: arm64: Add hyp per_cpu variable to track current physical cpu number Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 50/89] KVM: arm64: Ensure that TLBs and I-cache are private to each vcpu Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 51/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce per-EC entry/exit handlers Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 52/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce lazy-ish state sync for non-protected VMs Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 53/89] KVM: arm64: Lazy host FP save/restore Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 54/89] KVM: arm64: Reduce host/shadow vcpu state copying Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 55/89] KVM: arm64: Do not pass the vcpu to __pkvm_host_map_guest() Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 56/89] KVM: arm64: Check directly whether the vcpu is protected Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 57/89] KVM: arm64: Trap debug break and watch from guest Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 58/89] KVM: arm64: Restrict protected VM capabilities Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 59/89] KVM: arm64: Do not support MTE for protected VMs Will Deacon
2022-05-26 20:08   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-05-27  7:55     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-06-03  3:00       ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-06-04  8:26         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-07  0:20           ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-06-08 18:41             ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-07  0:42   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-06-08  7:40     ` Fuad Tabba
2022-06-08 17:39       ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 60/89] KVM: arm64: Refactor reset_mpidr to extract its computation Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 61/89] KVM: arm64: Reset sysregs for protected VMs Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 62/89] KVM: arm64: Move pkvm_vcpu_init_traps to shadow vcpu init Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 63/89] KVM: arm64: Fix initializing traps in protected mode Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 64/89] KVM: arm64: Advertise GICv3 sysreg interface to protected guests Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 65/89] KVM: arm64: Force injection of a data abort on NISV MMIO exit Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 66/89] KVM: arm64: Donate memory to protected guests Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 68/89] KVM: arm64: Move vgic state between host and shadow vcpu structures Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 69/89] KVM: arm64: Do not update virtual timer state for protected VMs Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 70/89] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth() for hyp use Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 71/89] KVM: arm64: Initialize shadow vm state at hyp Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 72/89] KVM: arm64: Track the SVE state in the shadow vcpu Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 73/89] KVM: arm64: Add HVC handling for protected guests at EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 74/89] KVM: arm64: Move pstate reset values to kvm_arm.h Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 75/89] KVM: arm64: Move some kvm_psci functions to a shared header Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 76/89] KVM: arm64: Factor out vcpu_reset code for core registers and PSCI Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 77/89] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI for protected VMs in EL2 Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 78/89] KVM: arm64: Don't expose TLBI hypercalls after de-privilege Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 79/89] KVM: arm64: Add is_pkvm_initialized() helper Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 80/89] KVM: arm64: Refactor enter_exception64() Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 81/89] KVM: arm64: Inject SIGSEGV on illegal accesses Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 82/89] KVM: arm64: Support TLB invalidation in guest context Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 83/89] KVM: arm64: Avoid BBM when changing only s/w bits in Stage-2 PTE Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:41 ` [PATCH 84/89] KVM: arm64: Extend memory sharing to allow guest-to-host transitions Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:42 ` [PATCH 85/89] KVM: arm64: Document the KVM/arm64-specific calls in hypercalls.rst Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:42 ` [PATCH 86/89] KVM: arm64: Reformat/beautify PTP hypercall documentation Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:42 ` [PATCH 87/89] KVM: arm64: Expose memory sharing hypercalls to protected guests Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:42 ` [PATCH 88/89] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_PROTECTED machine type for PVMs Will Deacon
2022-05-19 13:42 ` [PATCH 89/89] Documentation: KVM: Add some documentation for Protected KVM on arm64 Will Deacon
2022-06-07 22:39   ` Peter Collingbourne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220519134204.5379-68-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox