Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH 12/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Get rid of the lpi_list_lock
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:42:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227224249.2209194-13-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227224249.2209194-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

The last genuine use case for the lpi_list_lock was the global LPI
translation cache, which has been removed in favor of a per-ITS xarray.
Remove a layer from the locking puzzle by getting rid of it.

vgic_add_lpi() still has a critical section that needs to protect
against the insertion of other LPIs; change it to take the LPI xarray's
xa_lock to retain this property.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c |  1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c  | 17 ++++++-----------
 arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c      |  5 ++---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h          |  3 ---
 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index 6ee42f395253..aee6083d0da6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_init(&dist->lpi_list_lock);
 	xa_init_flags(&dist->lpi_xa, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 794e85b722de..ea830aa17b3e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
 	irq->target_vcpu = vcpu;
 	irq->group = 1;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+	xa_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * There could be a race with another vgic_add_lpi(), so we need to
@@ -84,14 +84,14 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	ret = xa_err(xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0));
+	ret = xa_err(__xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0));
 	if (ret) {
 		xa_release(&dist->lpi_xa, intid);
 		kfree(irq);
 	}
 
 out_unlock:
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+	xa_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
 
 	if (ret)
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -541,11 +541,8 @@ static struct vgic_irq *__vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
 static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
 					     u32 devid, u32 eventid)
 {
-	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	irq = __vgic_its_check_cache(kvm, db, devid, eventid);
@@ -553,7 +550,6 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_check_cache(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t db,
 		irq = NULL;
 
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
 
 	return irq;
 }
@@ -563,7 +559,6 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 				       struct vgic_irq *irq)
 {
 	unsigned long cache_key = vgic_its_cache_key(devid, eventid);
-	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	phys_addr_t db;
 
@@ -574,7 +569,7 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	if (xa_reserve_irq(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT))
 		return;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+	xa_lock_irqsave(&its->translation_cache, flags);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	/*
@@ -593,10 +588,10 @@ static void vgic_its_cache_translation(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
 	lockdep_assert_held(&its->its_lock);
 	vgic_get_irq_kref(irq);
 
-	xa_store(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, irq, 0);
+	__xa_store(&its->translation_cache, cache_key, irq, 0);
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags);
+	xa_unlock_irqrestore(&its->translation_cache, flags);
 }
 
 static void vgic_its_invalidate_cache(struct vgic_its *its)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
index e3ee1bc1214a..d0c59b51a6b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -29,9 +29,8 @@ struct vgic_global kvm_vgic_global_state __ro_after_init = {
  *       its->cmd_lock (mutex)
  *         its->its_lock (mutex)
  *           vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
- *             kvm->lpi_list_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
- *               vgic_dist->lpi_xa.xa_lock	must be taken with IRQs disabled
- *                 vgic_irq->irq_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ *             vgic_dist->lpi_xa.xa_lock	must be taken with IRQs disabled
+ *               vgic_irq->irq_lock		must be taken with IRQs disabled
  *
  * As the ap_list_lock might be taken from the timer interrupt handler,
  * we have to disable IRQs before taking this lock and everything lower
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 276082db9ae6..493b1f1c6bf7 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -280,9 +280,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
 	 */
 	u64			propbaser;
 
-	/* Protects the lpi_list. */
-	raw_spinlock_t		lpi_list_lock;
-
 #define LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER	XA_MARK_0
 	struct xarray		lpi_xa;
 
-- 
2.44.0.rc1.240.g4c46232300-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27 22:42 [PATCH 00/20] KVM: arm64: Transition to a per-ITS translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 01/20] KVM: Treat the device list as an rculist Oliver Upton
2024-02-28 13:33   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-28 17:18   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-28 18:07     ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-28 19:13       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-28 19:31         ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-28 20:23           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-28 21:07             ` Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 02/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in its_sync_lpi_pending_table() Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 03/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in vgic_its_invall() Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 04/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk LPI xarray in vgic_its_cmd_handle_movall() Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 05/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-debug: Use an xarray mark for debug iterator Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 06/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Get rid of vgic_copy_lpi_list() Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 07/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Scope translation cache invalidations to an ITS Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 08/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Spin off helper for finding ITS by doorbell addr Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 09/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Maintain a translation cache per ITS Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 10/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Use the per-ITS translation cache for injection Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 11/20] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Rip out the global translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 13/20] KVM: selftests: Align with kernel's GIC definitions Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 14/20] KVM: selftests: Standardise layout of GIC frames Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 15/20] KVM: selftests: Add quadword MMIO accessors Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 16/20] KVM: selftests: Add a minimal library for interacting with an ITS Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 17/20] KVM: selftests: Add helper for enabling LPIs on a redistributor Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 18/20] KVM: selftests: Use MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK from cputype.h Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 19/20] KVM: selftests: Hack in support for aligned page allocations Oliver Upton
2024-02-27 22:42 ` [PATCH 20/20] KVM: selftests: Add stress test for LPI injection Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240227224249.2209194-13-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox