Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	tabba@google.com,  seanjc@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  philmd@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,  oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,  joey.gouly@arm.com,
	rananta@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 07/44] KVM: arm64: Support TLB invalidation in guest context
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:34:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240327173531.1379685-8-tabba@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327173531.1379685-1-tabba@google.com>

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Typically, TLB invalidation of guest stage-2 mappings using nVHE is
performed by a hypercall originating from the host. For the invalidation
instruction to be effective, therefore, __tlb_switch_to_{guest,host}()
swizzle the active stage-2 context around the TLBI instruction.

With guest-to-host memory sharing and unsharing hypercalls
originating from the guest under pKVM, there is need to support
both guest and host VMID invalidations issued from guest context.

Replace the __tlb_switch_to_{guest,host}() functions with a more general
{enter,exit}_vmid_context() implementation which supports being invoked
from guest context and acts as a no-op if the target context matches the
running context.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
index a60fb13e2192..05a66b2ed76d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/tlb.c
@@ -11,13 +11,23 @@
 #include <nvhe/mem_protect.h>
 
 struct tlb_inv_context {
-	u64		tcr;
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu	*mmu;
+	u64			tcr;
+	u64			sctlr;
 };
 
-static void __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
-				  struct tlb_inv_context *cxt,
-				  bool nsh)
+static void enter_vmid_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
+			       struct tlb_inv_context *cxt,
+			       bool nsh)
 {
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu *host_s2_mmu = &host_mmu.arch.mmu;
+	struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+	host_ctxt = &this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
+	vcpu = host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu;
+	cxt->mmu = NULL;
+
 	/*
 	 * We have two requirements:
 	 *
@@ -40,20 +50,52 @@ static void __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	else
 		dsb(ish);
 
+	/*
+	 * If we're already in the desired context, then there's nothing
+	 * to do.
+	 */
+	if (vcpu) {
+		/* We're in guest context */
+		if (mmu == vcpu->arch.hw_mmu || WARN_ON(mmu != host_s2_mmu))
+			return;
+
+		cxt->mmu = vcpu->arch.hw_mmu;
+	} else {
+		/* We're in host context */
+		if (mmu == host_s2_mmu)
+			return;
+
+		cxt->mmu = host_s2_mmu;
+	}
+
 	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
 		u64 val;
 
 		/*
 		 * For CPUs that are affected by ARM 1319367, we need to
-		 * avoid a host Stage-1 walk while we have the guest's
-		 * VMID set in the VTTBR in order to invalidate TLBs.
-		 * We're guaranteed that the S1 MMU is enabled, so we can
-		 * simply set the EPD bits to avoid any further TLB fill.
+		 * avoid a Stage-1 walk with the old VMID while we have
+		 * the new VMID set in the VTTBR in order to invalidate TLBs.
+		 * We're guaranteed that the host S1 MMU is enabled, so
+		 * we can simply set the EPD bits to avoid any further
+		 * TLB fill. For guests, we ensure that the S1 MMU is
+		 * temporarily enabled in the next context.
 		 */
 		val = cxt->tcr = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TCR);
 		val |= TCR_EPD1_MASK | TCR_EPD0_MASK;
 		write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_TCR);
 		isb();
+
+		if (vcpu) {
+			val = cxt->sctlr = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR);
+			if (!(val & SCTLR_ELx_M)) {
+				val |= SCTLR_ELx_M;
+				write_sysreg_el1(val, SYS_SCTLR);
+				isb();
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* The host S1 MMU is always enabled. */
+			cxt->sctlr = SCTLR_ELx_M;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -62,20 +104,44 @@ static void __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	 * ensuring that we always have an ISB, but not two ISBs back
 	 * to back.
 	 */
-	__load_stage2(mmu, kern_hyp_va(mmu->arch));
+	if (vcpu)
+		__load_host_stage2();
+	else
+		__load_stage2(mmu, kern_hyp_va(mmu->arch));
+
 	asm(ALTERNATIVE("isb", "nop", ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT));
 }
 
-static void __tlb_switch_to_host(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
+static void exit_vmid_context(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
 {
-	__load_host_stage2();
+	struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = cxt->mmu;
+	struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+
+	host_ctxt = &this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_host_data)->host_ctxt;
+	vcpu = host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu;
+
+	if (!mmu)
+		return;
+
+	if (vcpu)
+		__load_stage2(mmu, kern_hyp_va(mmu->arch));
+	else
+		__load_host_stage2();
 
 	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
-		/* Ensure write of the host VMID */
+		/* Ensure write of the old VMID */
 		isb();
-		/* Restore the host's TCR_EL1 */
+
+		if (!(cxt->sctlr & SCTLR_ELx_M)) {
+			write_sysreg_el1(cxt->sctlr, SYS_SCTLR);
+			isb();
+		}
+
 		write_sysreg_el1(cxt->tcr, SYS_TCR);
 	}
+
+	cxt->mmu = NULL;
 }
 
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
@@ -84,7 +150,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt, false);
+	enter_vmid_context(mmu, &cxt, false);
 
 	/*
 	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
@@ -105,7 +171,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	dsb(ish);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	exit_vmid_context(&cxt);
 }
 
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
@@ -114,7 +180,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt, true);
+	enter_vmid_context(mmu, &cxt, true);
 
 	/*
 	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
@@ -135,7 +201,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	dsb(nsh);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	exit_vmid_context(&cxt);
 }
 
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
@@ -152,7 +218,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	start = round_down(start, stride);
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt, false);
+	enter_vmid_context(mmu, &cxt, false);
 
 	__flush_s2_tlb_range_op(ipas2e1is, start, pages, stride, 0);
 
@@ -161,7 +227,7 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	dsb(ish);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	exit_vmid_context(&cxt);
 }
 
 void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
@@ -169,13 +235,13 @@ void __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt, false);
+	enter_vmid_context(mmu, &cxt, false);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
 	dsb(ish);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	exit_vmid_context(&cxt);
 }
 
 void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
@@ -183,19 +249,19 @@ void __kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
 	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
-	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt, false);
+	enter_vmid_context(mmu, &cxt, false);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);
 	asm volatile("ic iallu");
 	dsb(nsh);
 	isb();
 
-	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
+	exit_vmid_context(&cxt);
 }
 
 void __kvm_flush_vm_context(void)
 {
-	/* Same remark as in __tlb_switch_to_guest() */
+	/* Same remark as in enter_vmid_context() */
 	dsb(ish);
 	__tlbi(alle1is);
 	dsb(ish);
-- 
2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-27 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-27 17:34 [PATCH v1 00/44] KVM: arm64: Preamble for pKVM Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 01/44] KVM: arm64: Change kvm_handle_mmio_return() return polarity Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 02/44] KVM: arm64: Use enum instead of helper for checking FP-state Fuad Tabba
2024-03-28 16:19   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-08  7:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-08 13:39     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 03/44] KVM: arm64: Move setting the page as dirty out of the critical section Fuad Tabba
2024-04-08  7:41   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-08 15:41     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-04-08 15:53       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-08 15:57         ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 04/44] KVM: arm64: Avoid BUG-ing from the host abort path Fuad Tabba
2024-04-08  7:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-08 13:48     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 05/44] KVM: arm64: Check for PTE validity when checking for executable/cacheable Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 06/44] KVM: arm64: Avoid BBM when changing only s/w bits in Stage-2 PTE Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2024-04-15 11:36   ` [PATCH v1 07/44] KVM: arm64: Support TLB invalidation in guest context Marc Zyngier
2024-04-15 15:02     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-04-15 15:59       ` Marc Zyngier
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 08/44] KVM: arm64: Simplify vgic-v3 hypercalls Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 09/44] KVM: arm64: Add is_pkvm_initialized() helper Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 10/44] KVM: arm64: Introduce predicates to check for protected state Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 11/44] KVM: arm64: Split up nvhe/fixed_config.h Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v1 12/44] KVM: arm64: Move pstate reset value definitions to kvm_arm.h Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 13/44] KVM: arm64: Clarify rationale for ZCR_EL1 value restored on guest exit Fuad Tabba
2024-03-28 18:53   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-08 13:34     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 14/44] KVM: arm64: Refactor calculating SVE state size to use helpers Fuad Tabba
2024-03-28 18:57   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-08 13:35     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 15/44] KVM: arm64: Use active guest SVE vector length on guest restore Fuad Tabba
2024-03-28 19:17   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-09  9:34     ` Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 16/44] KVM: arm64: Do not map the host fpsimd state to hyp in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2024-03-28 19:20   ` Mark Brown
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 17/44] KVM: arm64: Move some kvm_psci functions to a shared header Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 18/44] KVM: arm64: Refactor reset_mpidr() to extract its computation Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 19/44] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth() for hyp use Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 20/44] KVM: arm64: Refactor enter_exception64() Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 21/44] KVM: arm64: Add PC_UPDATE_REQ flags covering all PC updates Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 22/44] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu flag copy primitive Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 23/44] KVM: arm64: Introduce gfn_to_memslot_prot() Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 24/44] KVM: arm64: Do not use the hva in kvm_handle_guest_abort() Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 25/44] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_rwlock_t Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 26/44] KVM: arm64: Add atomics-based checking refcount implementation at EL2 Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 27/44] KVM: arm64: Use atomic refcount helpers for 'struct hyp_page::refcount' Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 28/44] KVM: arm64: Remove locking from EL2 allocation fast-paths Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 29/44] KVM: arm64: Reformat/beautify PTP hypercall documentation Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 30/44] KVM: arm64: Rename firmware pseudo-register documentation file Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 31/44] KVM: arm64: Document the KVM/arm64-specific calls in hypercalls.rst Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 32/44] KVM: arm64: Prevent kmemleak from accessing .hyp.data Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 33/44] KVM: arm64: Issue CMOs when tearing down guest s2 pages Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 34/44] KVM: arm64: Do not set the virtual timer offset for protected vCPUs Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 35/44] KVM: arm64: Fix comment for __pkvm_vcpu_init_traps() Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 36/44] KVM: arm64: Do not re-initialize the KVM lock Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 37/44] KVM: arm64: Check directly whether a vcpu is protected Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 38/44] KVM: arm64: Trap debug break and watch from guest Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 39/44] KVM: arm64: Restrict protected VM capabilities Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 40/44] KVM: arm64: Do not support MTE for protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 41/44] KVM: arm64: Move pkvm_vcpu_init_traps() to hyp vcpu init Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 42/44] KVM: arm64: Fix initializing traps in protected mode Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 43/44] KVM: arm64: Advertise GICv3 sysreg interface to protected guests Fuad Tabba
2024-03-27 17:35 ` [PATCH v1 44/44] KVM: arm64: Force injection of a data abort on NISV MMIO exit Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240327173531.1379685-8-tabba@google.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox