Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Clarify safety of allowing TLBI unmaps to reschedule
Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2024 16:42:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007164256.1795250-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007164256.1795250-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

There's been a decent amount of attention around unmaps of nested MMUs,
and TLBI handling is no exception to this. Add a comment clarifying why
it is safe to reschedule during a TLBI unmap, even without a reference
on the MMU in progress.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index e0c7cc16466e..b773d107cd35 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2955,6 +2955,29 @@ union tlbi_info {
 static void s2_mmu_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 			       const union tlbi_info *info)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The unmap operation is allowed to drop the MMU lock and block, which
+	 * means that @mmu could be used for a different context than the one
+	 * currently being invalidated.
+	 *
+	 * This behavior is still safe, as:
+	 *
+	 *  1) The vCPU that recycled the MMU is responsible for invalidating
+	 *     the entire MMU before reusing it, which still honors the intent
+	 *     of a TLBI.
+	 *
+	 *  2) Until the guest TLBI instruction is 'retired' (i.e. increment PC
+	 *     and ERET to the guest), other vCPUs are allowed to use stale
+	 *     translations.
+	 *
+	 *  3) Accidentally unmapping an unrelated MMU context is nonfatal, and
+	 *     at worst may cause more aborts for shadow stage-2 fills.
+	 *
+	 * Dropping the MMU lock also implies that shadow stage-2 fills could
+	 * happen behind the back of the TLBI. This is still safe, though, as
+	 * the L1 needs to put its stage-2 in a consistent state before doing
+	 * the TLBI.
+	 */
 	kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, info->range.start, info->range.size, true);
 }
 
@@ -3050,6 +3073,10 @@ static void s2_mmu_unmap_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
 	max_size = compute_tlb_inval_range(mmu, info->ipa.addr);
 	base_addr &= ~(max_size - 1);
 
+	/*
+	 * See comment in s2_mmu_unmap_range() for why this is allowed to
+	 * reschedule.
+	 */
 	kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, base_addr, max_size, true);
 }
 
-- 
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07 16:42 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for stage-2 MMU recycling Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Keep reference on stage-2 MMU when scheduled out Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 18:39   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 19:01     ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 19:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 21:22         ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 22:18           ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Do not block when unmapping stage-2 if disallowed Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Punt stage-2 recycling to a vCPU request Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 19:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2024-10-07 19:16     ` Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 16:42 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-10-07 18:51   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Clarify safety of allowing TLBI unmaps to reschedule Sean Christopherson
2024-10-07 19:20     ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007164256.1795250-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox