From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Clarify safety of allowing TLBI unmaps to reschedule
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 23:30:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007233028.2236133-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007233028.2236133-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
There's been a decent amount of attention around unmaps of nested MMUs,
and TLBI handling is no exception to this. Add a comment clarifying why
it is safe to reschedule during a TLBI unmap, even without a reference
on the MMU in progress.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index e0c7cc16466e..48903821142b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2955,6 +2955,29 @@ union tlbi_info {
static void s2_mmu_unmap_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
const union tlbi_info *info)
{
+ /*
+ * The unmap operation is allowed to drop the MMU lock and block, which
+ * means that @mmu could be used for a different context than the one
+ * currently being invalidated.
+ *
+ * This behavior is still safe, as:
+ *
+ * 1) The vCPU(s) that recycled the MMU are responsible for invalidating
+ * the entire MMU before reusing it, which still honors the intent
+ * of a TLBI.
+ *
+ * 2) Until the guest TLBI instruction is 'retired' (i.e. increment PC
+ * and ERET to the guest), other vCPUs are allowed to use stale
+ * translations.
+ *
+ * 3) Accidentally unmapping an unrelated MMU context is nonfatal, and
+ * at worst may cause more aborts for shadow stage-2 fills.
+ *
+ * Dropping the MMU lock also implies that shadow stage-2 fills could
+ * happen behind the back of the TLBI. This is still safe, though, as
+ * the L1 needs to put its stage-2 in a consistent state before doing
+ * the TLBI.
+ */
kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, info->range.start, info->range.size, true);
}
@@ -3050,6 +3073,10 @@ static void s2_mmu_unmap_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
max_size = compute_tlb_inval_range(mmu, info->ipa.addr);
base_addr &= ~(max_size - 1);
+ /*
+ * See comment in s2_mmu_unmap_range() for why this is allowed to
+ * reschedule.
+ */
kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, base_addr, max_size, true);
}
--
2.47.0.rc0.187.ge670bccf7e-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-07 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 23:30 [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for stage-2 MMU recycling Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Keep reference on stage-2 MMU when scheduled out Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Do not block when unmapping stage-2 if disallowed Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Punt stage-2 recycling to a vCPU request Oliver Upton
2024-10-07 23:30 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-10-08 9:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] KVM: arm64: nv: Fixes for stage-2 MMU recycling Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241007233028.2236133-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox