From: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
To: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, KVMARM <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
ARMLinux <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.coma>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Utilize the dummy entry in ITS tables restoring
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:34:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105193422.1094875-5-jingzhangos@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105193422.1094875-1-jingzhangos@google.com>
Now, the first entry in tables is either a valid DTE/ITE or a dummy
entry pointing to the first valid DTE/ITE. Revise the DTE/ITE restore
process to utilize the dummy entry to avoid unnecessary (erroneous)
entry scanning.
This is not supposed to break the ITS table ABI REV0.
Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 867cc5d3521d..e07939613f5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -2129,23 +2129,30 @@ static int vgic_its_restore_ite(struct vgic_its *its, u32 event_id,
u32 coll_id, lpi_id;
struct its_ite *ite;
u32 offset;
+ u32 magic;
val = *p;
val = le64_to_cpu(val);
- coll_id = val & KVM_ITS_ITE_ICID_MASK;
lpi_id = (val & KVM_ITS_ITE_PINTID_MASK) >> KVM_ITS_ITE_PINTID_SHIFT;
- if (!lpi_id)
- return event_id + 1; /* invalid entry, no choice but to scan next entry */
+ offset = val >> KVM_ITS_ITE_NEXT_SHIFT;
+ if (event_id + offset >= BIT_ULL(dev->num_eventid_bits))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!lpi_id) {
+ magic = (val & KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_MASK) >> KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_SHIFT;
+ if (magic != KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_MAGIC)
+ offset = 1;
+
+ return event_id + offset;
+ }
if (lpi_id < VGIC_MIN_LPI)
return -EINVAL;
- offset = val >> KVM_ITS_ITE_NEXT_SHIFT;
- if (event_id + offset >= BIT_ULL(dev->num_eventid_bits))
- return -EINVAL;
+ coll_id = val & KVM_ITS_ITE_ICID_MASK;
collection = find_collection(its, coll_id);
if (!collection)
@@ -2303,17 +2310,30 @@ static int vgic_its_restore_dte(struct vgic_its *its, u32 id,
u64 entry = *(u64 *)ptr;
bool valid;
u32 offset;
+ u32 magic;
int ret;
entry = le64_to_cpu(entry);
valid = entry >> KVM_ITS_DTE_VALID_SHIFT;
- num_eventid_bits = (entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_SIZE_MASK) + 1;
- itt_addr = ((entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_ITTADDR_MASK)
- >> KVM_ITS_DTE_ITTADDR_SHIFT) << 8;
- if (!valid)
- return id + 1;
+ /*
+ * Since we created a dummy head entry for the DTE static linked list in
+ * the table if necessary, no need to scan to find the list head.
+ * But if the saved table was done without dummy entry support, we still
+ * have to scan one by one.
+ */
+ if (!valid) {
+ magic = (entry & KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_MASK) >>
+ KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_SHIFT;
+ if (magic != KVM_ITS_ENTRY_DUMMY_MAGIC)
+ offset = 1;
+ else
+ offset = (entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_DUMMY_NEXT_MASK) >>
+ KVM_ITS_DTE_DUMMY_NEXT_SHIFT;
+
+ return id + offset;
+ }
/* dte entry is valid */
offset = (entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_NEXT_MASK) >> KVM_ITS_DTE_NEXT_SHIFT;
@@ -2321,6 +2341,10 @@ static int vgic_its_restore_dte(struct vgic_its *its, u32 id,
if (!vgic_its_check_id(its, baser, id, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
+ num_eventid_bits = (entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_SIZE_MASK) + 1;
+ itt_addr = ((entry & KVM_ITS_DTE_ITTADDR_MASK)
+ >> KVM_ITS_DTE_ITTADDR_SHIFT) << 8;
+
dev = vgic_its_alloc_device(its, id, itt_addr, num_eventid_bits);
if (IS_ERR(dev))
return PTR_ERR(dev);
--
2.47.0.199.ga7371fff76-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 19:34 [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix a bug in VGIC ITS tables' save/restore Jing Zhang
2024-11-05 19:34 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Test VGIC ITS tables save/restore Jing Zhang
2024-11-05 19:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Add a dummy DTE/ITE if necessary in ITS tables save operation Jing Zhang
2024-11-05 19:34 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Return device/event id instead of offset in ITS tables restore Jing Zhang
2024-11-05 19:34 ` Jing Zhang [this message]
2024-11-05 21:33 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix a bug in VGIC ITS tables' save/restore Oliver Upton
2024-11-05 21:56 ` Jing Zhang
2024-11-05 21:58 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241105193422.1094875-5-jingzhangos@google.com \
--to=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.coma \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox