From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, mark.rutland@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, vdonnefort@google.com,
tabba@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Factor out setting HCRX_EL2 traps into separate function
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 21:55:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250226215520.1759218-2-tabba@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226215520.1759218-1-tabba@google.com>
Factor out the code for setting a vcpu's HCRX_EL2 traps in to a
separate inline function. This allows us to share the logic with
pKVM when setting the traps in protected mode.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 20 +-------------------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 78ec1ef2cfe8..31c8497372d0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -649,4 +649,28 @@ static inline bool guest_hyp_sve_traps_enabled(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return __guest_hyp_cptr_xen_trap_enabled(vcpu, ZEN);
}
+
+static inline void vcpu_set_hcrx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+
+ if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) {
+ /*
+ * In general, all HCRX_EL2 bits are gated by a feature.
+ * The only reason we can set SMPME without checking any
+ * feature is that its effects are not directly observable
+ * from the guest.
+ */
+ vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 = HCRX_EL2_SMPME;
+
+ if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, MOPS, IMP))
+ vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2);
+
+ if (kvm_has_tcr2(kvm))
+ vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= HCRX_EL2_TCR2En;
+
+ if (kvm_has_fpmr(kvm))
+ vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= HCRX_EL2_EnFPM;
+ }
+}
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 82430c1e1dd0..16ce5f584e7c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -4971,25 +4971,7 @@ void kvm_calculate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
vcpu_set_hcr(vcpu);
vcpu_set_ich_hcr(vcpu);
-
- if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) {
- /*
- * In general, all HCRX_EL2 bits are gated by a feature.
- * The only reason we can set SMPME without checking any
- * feature is that its effects are not directly observable
- * from the guest.
- */
- vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 = HCRX_EL2_SMPME;
-
- if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, MOPS, IMP))
- vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2);
-
- if (kvm_has_tcr2(kvm))
- vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= HCRX_EL2_TCR2En;
-
- if (kvm_has_fpmr(kvm))
- vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= HCRX_EL2_EnFPM;
- }
+ vcpu_set_hcrx(vcpu);
if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_FGU_INITIALIZED, &kvm->arch.flags))
goto out;
--
2.48.1.711.g2feabab25a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 21:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix initializing HCRX_EL2 and other traps in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2025-02-26 21:55 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-02-26 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Initialize HCRX_EL2 " Fuad Tabba
2025-02-26 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Factor out pKVM hyp vcpu creation to separate function Fuad Tabba
2025-02-28 19:44 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-03 7:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 19:18 ` Will Deacon
2025-03-03 19:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 21:49 ` Will Deacon
2025-03-04 12:33 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 15:29 ` Will Deacon
2025-03-12 15:31 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-14 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2025-02-26 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Create each pKVM hyp vcpu after its corresponding host vcpu Fuad Tabba
2025-02-27 12:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-27 12:47 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-27 14:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-27 14:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: Fix initializing HCRX_EL2 and other traps in pKVM Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250226215520.1759218-2-tabba@google.com \
--to=tabba@google.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox