Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Unmap vLPIs affected by changes to GSI routing information
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 09:08:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250523160810.4049313-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250523160810.4049313-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

KVM's interrupt infrastructure is dodgy at best, allowing for some ugly
'off label' usage of the various UAPIs. In one example, userspace can
change the routing entry of a particular "GSI" after configuring
irqbypass with KVM_IRQFD. KVM/arm64 is oblivious to this, and winds up
preserving the stale translation in cases where vLPIs are configured.

Honor userspace's intentions and tear down the vLPI mapping if affected
by a "GSI" routing change. Make no attempt to reconstruct vLPIs if the
new target is an MSI and just fall back to software injection.

Tested-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 1de49b48e35e..505d504b52b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -2790,6 +2790,7 @@ int kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	return kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq,
 					  &irqfd->irq_entry);
 }
+
 void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 				      struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
 {
@@ -2803,6 +2804,28 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons,
 	kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arch_irqfd_route_changed(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *old,
+				  struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *new)
+{
+	if (new->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
+		return true;
+
+	return memcmp(&old->msi, &new->msi, sizeof(new->msi));
+}
+
+int kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
+				  uint32_t guest_irq, bool set)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Remapping the vLPI requires taking the its_lock mutex to resolve
+	 * the new translation. We're in spinlock land at this point, so no
+	 * chance of resolving the translation.
+	 *
+	 * Unmap the vLPI and fall back to software LPI injection.
+	 */
+	return kvm_vgic_v4_unset_forwarding(kvm, host_irq);
+}
+
 void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
 {
 	struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd =
-- 
2.39.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-23 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-23 16:08 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Some VGIC-related fixes Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Use lock guard in vgic_v4_set_forwarding() Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Protect vLPI translation with vgic_irq::irq_lock Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Resolve vLPI by host IRQ in vgic_v4_unset_forwarding() Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 17:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-23 18:22     ` Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 16:08 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-05-23 17:26   ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Unmap vLPIs affected by changes to GSI routing information Marc Zyngier
2025-05-23 17:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-23 18:14       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-23 20:54         ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-23 20:58           ` Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: vgic-init: Plug vCPU vs. VGIC creation race Oliver Upton
2025-05-23 17:35 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Some VGIC-related fixes Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250523160810.4049313-5-oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=sweettea@google.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox