From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f74.google.com (mail-pj1-f74.google.com [209.85.216.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ACBD33E37B for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.74 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761855066; cv=none; b=KOwAYkyzaaiBhs+f8dnYwp3nwiWWRLRhIXGMCeHd5jsQurWCMG4EUSSWkQU0OdXvFxDkXYgMrsRR8COtH/xEd7oAInT+r8zunMlOKnhsxmGk/Az3BgST0BuHUdh/OkvuvDLDcl4ZBYOrr3Yi37ZBnRYZ+y0NbrcieUP0I6iIeBk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761855066; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3OodWTNKfo3eGtZ7Fc7X1fUwmvd4oILOljrjn90Df3M=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=GhLffiMi1Qwup6Tmfdm/4DDa/FR9ssvGcWRiVV5m90mHb4xxw3tFZH5M1vET9fSim9PsBrSEEpJ8UIIOKoVHRrcFhM59kUGVIEWq/Rr04Rl44C7Y7JBjMVwXAD5/HJaC0s+QmKG8f0sBFOHFaXYpNj2/eIlU9AwxL4LsCW3zUdA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=yt//UBdj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="yt//UBdj" Received: by mail-pj1-f74.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-32edda89a37so1493456a91.1 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1761855064; x=1762459864; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ixX9GQx535IvklNL5bVhTvm5cxC1bAxRsqCoHbh8pSg=; b=yt//UBdjo582q5rs6I28zAFcWWq5mLL/cpXPD44JBDipHUr7APFkrUYr/Jsks/RfXN rYvpHz2jruG8TpKTjV+rYEHT2UoCzDfUragAXhhCOGsek6/UHstwkcIkiaL7dZcdaWo4 Cowqyq7oY9ZDyPtuSD1S/kgR7wXXwAwOo9YtqeSHsF2tf2kX7IUEKf2bUZWOgou7cCsW vfLGcNenSm1P60jEogj2KTF10fN/ig4d64VIGla5bnaykAHeUNqOFNXxGIJ0KyV6JQ9x 6PTzJ7g95owfVETHHZGisfxHXUPa5CDTVw4A8y8XzOBi7KnWyPG7lvIbCgKVf0Pejm1D BH4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761855064; x=1762459864; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ixX9GQx535IvklNL5bVhTvm5cxC1bAxRsqCoHbh8pSg=; b=X4r6X6Bx1WwQW8LU6rL+CSfFXURj0kRXCfZe69Qrf2fiwyaje2AVjUBm9oOPrCZBOB 45ekSNJo6WEd/JJjlIxNGfHBHtVc47FOuSvM5Pw884mFNEne1yRsiMz+0jido2BTQ3Ea 5H55p76q+Y4FboxrkC2GkMntgwIVikpjIg4IIRa0jPfpFhVX+MIdxnbPqKZAO4Vf7AZA L/MqrF0W9UIJ1T5A07AXDHiZhdHgd/X8vuxbNFuBnS+bE6H2Cc/4jPeR9Aii+2oyosUQ ZR95zp+CMFiB0gqGJYHAK42lDpDhqILVpzdunlOvf58pyuYsC1E5dDr/4z1GKdVqXIGQ nr2Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX0Gee8fU5509l+lZRMfqLGojwYG/mLBAw84eqBKQfwp/sMNyAabgdrfD4djINCym3yCm+VLN0=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw09IxJN0/j5ZoDLSOvBTNNsxzGsDFq3SpJam46JJOSsPS8nABP DSOdqSEQ0zxPBpK7XCiNtCfkAAOK5DYDWuClggVPPgwwkKVFno8Q9awwNzZVKoKZ3F683oJNeEk 2D/pyZA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFyAaLKG8h2LJ84hJgHQ75wx3G0tk8Vj+W9kFkkyUvmGPkijC+6POH5qOYkAqbj7Ex/aKtYOd6js0k= X-Received: from pjbcq19.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90a:f993:b0:339:ee5f:ec32]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:4b10:b0:340:2a16:94be with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-34082fab1e6mr1328002a91.4.1761855063621; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 13:09:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20251030200951.3402865-1-seanjc@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20251030200951.3402865-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1.930.gacf6e81ea2-goog Message-ID: <20251030200951.3402865-27-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v4 26/28] KVM: TDX: Guard VM state transitions with "all" the locks From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Madhavan Srinivasan , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda , Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny , Kai Huang , Binbin Wu , Michael Roth , Yan Zhao , Vishal Annapurve , Rick Edgecombe , Ackerley Tng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Acquire kvm->lock, kvm->slots_lock, and all vcpu->mutex locks when servicing ioctls that (a) transition the TD to a new state, i.e. when doing INIT or FINALIZE or (b) are only valid if the TD is in a specific state, i.e. when initializing a vCPU or memory region. Acquiring "all" the locks fixes several KVM_BUG_ON() situations where a SEAMCALL can fail due to racing actions, e.g. if tdh_vp_create() contends with either tdh_mr_extend() or tdh_mr_finalize(). For all intents and purposes, the paths in question are fully serialized, i.e. there's no reason to try and allow anything remotely interesting to happen. Smack 'em with a big hammer instead of trying to be "nice". Acquire kvm->lock to prevent VM-wide things from happening, slots_lock to prevent kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(), and _all_ vCPU mutexes to prevent vCPUs from interefering. Use the recently-renamed kvm_arch_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl() to service the vCPU-scoped ioctls to avoid a lock inversion problem, e.g. due to taking vcpu->mutex outside kvm->lock. See also commit ecf371f8b02d ("KVM: SVM: Reject SEV{-ES} intra host migration if vCPU creation is in-flight"), which fixed a similar bug with SEV intra-host migration where an in-flight vCPU creation could race with a VM-wide state transition. Define a fancy new CLASS to handle the lock+check => unlock logic with guard()-like syntax: CLASS(tdx_vm_state_guard, guard)(kvm); if (IS_ERR(guard)) return PTR_ERR(guard); to simplify juggling the many locks. Note! Take kvm->slots_lock *after* all vcpu->mutex locks, as per KVM's soon-to-be-documented lock ordering rules[1]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251016235538.171962-1-seanjc@google.com [1] Reported-by: Yan Zhao Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aLFiPq1smdzN3Ary@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c index 57dfddd2a6cf..8bcdec049ac6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c @@ -2653,6 +2653,46 @@ static int tdx_read_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 leaf, u32 sub_leaf, return -EIO; } +typedef void *tdx_vm_state_guard_t; + +static tdx_vm_state_guard_t tdx_acquire_vm_state_locks(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + int r; + + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + + if (kvm->created_vcpus != atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) { + r = -EBUSY; + goto out_err; + } + + r = kvm_lock_all_vcpus(kvm); + if (r) + goto out_err; + + /* + * Note the unintuitive ordering! vcpu->mutex must be taken outside + * kvm->slots_lock! + */ + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); + return kvm; + +out_err: + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + return ERR_PTR(r); +} + +static void tdx_release_vm_state_locks(struct kvm *kvm) +{ + mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock); + kvm_unlock_all_vcpus(kvm); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); +} + +DEFINE_CLASS(tdx_vm_state_guard, tdx_vm_state_guard_t, + if (!IS_ERR(_T)) tdx_release_vm_state_locks(_T), + tdx_acquire_vm_state_locks(kvm), struct kvm *kvm); + static int tdx_td_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *cmd) { struct kvm_tdx_init_vm __user *user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(cmd->data); @@ -2764,8 +2804,6 @@ static int tdx_td_finalize(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *cmd) { struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm); - guard(mutex)(&kvm->slots_lock); - if (!is_hkid_assigned(kvm_tdx) || kvm_tdx->state == TD_STATE_RUNNABLE) return -EINVAL; @@ -2809,7 +2847,9 @@ int tdx_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm, void __user *argp) if (tdx_cmd.id == KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES) return tdx_get_capabilities(&tdx_cmd); - guard(mutex)(&kvm->lock); + CLASS(tdx_vm_state_guard, guard)(kvm); + if (IS_ERR(guard)) + return PTR_ERR(guard); switch (tdx_cmd.id) { case KVM_TDX_INIT_VM: @@ -3113,8 +3153,6 @@ static int tdx_vcpu_init_mem_region(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *c if (tdx->state != VCPU_TD_STATE_INITIALIZED) return -EINVAL; - guard(mutex)(&kvm->slots_lock); - /* Once TD is finalized, the initial guest memory is fixed. */ if (kvm_tdx->state == TD_STATE_RUNNABLE) return -EINVAL; @@ -3170,7 +3208,8 @@ static int tdx_vcpu_init_mem_region(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_tdx_cmd *c int tdx_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp) { - struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(vcpu->kvm); + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; + struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm); struct kvm_tdx_cmd cmd; int r; @@ -3178,12 +3217,13 @@ int tdx_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp) if (r) return r; + CLASS(tdx_vm_state_guard, guard)(kvm); + if (IS_ERR(guard)) + return PTR_ERR(guard); + if (!is_hkid_assigned(kvm_tdx) || kvm_tdx->state == TD_STATE_RUNNABLE) return -EINVAL; - if (mutex_lock_killable(&vcpu->mutex)) - return -EINTR; - vcpu_load(vcpu); switch (cmd.id) { @@ -3200,7 +3240,6 @@ int tdx_vcpu_unlocked_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp) vcpu_put(vcpu); - mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex); return r; } -- 2.51.1.930.gacf6e81ea2-goog