From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Donnefort" <vdonnefort@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_printk event to nVHE/pKVM hyp
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:33:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612143326.93B2B1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612142245.1015744-5-vdonnefort@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Linker script alignment mismatch causes the host to read padding bytes instead of trace format strings.
- [High] Missing format string validation in `trace_hyp_printk` allows host kernel panics via `%s` and information leaks via argument mismatch.
--
commit d7bc5a6433c1c6dd4e023e0c02d6df0881142324
Author: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>
KVM: arm64: Add hyp_printk event to nVHE/pKVM hyp
This commit adds a trace_hyp_printk() mechanism to allow logging from
the nVHE/pKVM hypervisor into the host's tracing buffer. The format
strings are stored in a kernel-accessible ELF section, while the
hypervisor writes the string ID and arguments.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> index e1ac876200a3d..b6d62642b6bdb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
[ ... ]
> @@ -324,6 +324,10 @@ SECTIONS
> __hyp_events_start = .;
> *(SORT(_hyp_events.*))
> __hyp_events_end = .;
> +
> + __hyp_string_fmts_start = .;
[Severity: High]
Does this lack of alignment before __hyp_string_fmts_start cause pointer
arithmetic issues?
The start symbol is defined without an explicit alignment directive like
. = ALIGN(8);. Because struct hyp_string_fmt is a 128-byte array, the
compiler may align it to a larger boundary. The __hyp_string_fmts_start
symbol captures the location counter before the section's alignment
requirements are processed by the linker.
Later in __trace_hyp_printk() within arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trace.h,
the pointer arithmetic:
entry->fmt_id = fmt - __hyp_string_fmts_start;
can yield a corrupted index if the start symbol includes padding bytes. The
host reconstructs the pointer using this corrupted index in
__hyp_trace_printk(), causing it to read padding bytes instead of the actual
trace format strings.
> + *(_hyp_string_fmts)
> + __hyp_string_fmts_end = .;
> }
> #endif
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trace.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trace.h
> index 8813ff250f8e0..3d0b5c634bb3f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/trace.h
[ ... ]
> +#define trace_hyp_printk(__fmt, __args...) \
> +do { \
> + static struct hyp_string_fmt __used __section("_hyp_string_fmts") fmt = { \
> + .fmt = __fmt \
> + }; \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(__fmt) > HYP_STRING_FMT_MAX_SIZE); \
> + /* __TO_U64 prepends a comma if there are arguments */ \
> + __trace_hyp_printk(&fmt, COUNT_ARGS(__args) __TO_U64(__args)); \
> +} while (0)
[Severity: High]
Could this missing format validation lead to host kernel panics or
information leaks?
The trace_hyp_printk macro blindly casts arguments to u64 without verifying
that they match the format string at compile time.
This can cause severe cross-privilege issues:
1. If an EL2 developer uses the %s format specifier, the macro casts the EL2
string pointer to u64 and passes it to the host. The host's trace_seq_printf
would attempt to dereference the EL2 virtual address, resulting in an
immediate EL1 translation fault and host kernel panic.
2. If a developer passes fewer arguments than format specifiers (for example,
trace_hyp_printk("x=%d y=%d", x)), the COUNT_ARGS macro returns 1, and the
host executes the case 1: block in __hyp_trace_printk. The underlying
vsnprintf on the host will parse the second %d and fetch the missing argument
from the host kernel's stack or registers, leaking host kernel memory into
the trace buffer.
Could we add a dummy __attribute__((format(printf))) check to ensure
these mismatches are caught during the build?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260612142245.1015744-1-vdonnefort@google.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 14:22 [PATCH v1 0/4] trace_hyp_printk() for pKVM/nVHE hypervisor Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: arm64: Allow early calls to pKVM host_share/unshare_hyp Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-12 14:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 13:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: arm64: Move kvm_define_hypevents.h to arch/arm64/kvm/ Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-14 13:41 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] tracing/remotes: Add REMOTE_EVENT_CUSTOM_PRINTK() helper Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-12 14:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-14 14:46 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-12 14:22 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: arm64: Add hyp_printk event to nVHE/pKVM hyp Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-12 14:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-14 15:25 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 8:29 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-14 12:57 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] trace_hyp_printk() for pKVM/nVHE hypervisor Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 8:27 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-15 8:30 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-06-15 8:57 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612143326.93B2B1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox