From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Ene" <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:29:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617152902.0C7731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260617145130.3729015-8-sebastianene@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Downgrade responses from EL3 during FF-A version negotiation are silently ignored and used as a higher version.
--
commit 0d02d44ef9bc090a9ae03e08d6cec358827371ce
Author: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler
This commit prevents leaking hypervisor stack data to the host when using
the FFA_VERSION call by explicitly zeroing the stack-allocated variable
before returning data.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616160016.C62C81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void do_ffa_part_get(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
>
> bool kvm_host_ffa_handler(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt, u32 func_id)
> {
> - struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res = {0};
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while looking at the FF-A
version handling, I noticed an issue with version negotiation in
do_ffa_version().
When EL2 queries EL3 during version negotiation, does the code correctly
handle downgrade responses?
It appears EL2 only checks if the response is FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED:
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c:do_ffa_version() {
hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(&(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs) {
.a0 = FFA_VERSION,
.a1 = ffa_req_version,
}, res);
if ((s32)res->a0 == FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED)
goto unlock;
hyp_ffa_version = ffa_req_version;
}
If EL3 returns a version smaller than the requested ffa_req_version
(a downgrade response), should res->a0 be validated against ffa_req_version
before unconditionally setting hyp_ffa_version = ffa_req_version?
Silently using a higher version than EL3 actually supports might cause
struct layout misinterpretations (like mismatched offsets) leading to
memory corruption or out-of-bounds reads during subsequent memory sharing
calls.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260617145130.3729015-1-sebastianene@google.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-17 14:51 [PATCH v7 0/7] arm_ffa, KVM: Fix FF-A emad offset calculations Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] optee: ffa: Add NULL check in optee_ffa_lend_protmem Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 15:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-29 8:53 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-06-30 10:13 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix out-of-bound writes in ffa_setup_and_transmit() Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix Endpoint Memory Access Descriptor offset calculation Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] KVM: arm64: Fix bounds checking in do_ffa_mem_reclaim() Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 15:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-18 16:19 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] KVM: arm64: Validate the offset to the mem access descriptor Sebastian Ene
2026-06-18 16:56 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-22 9:23 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-22 11:22 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] KVM: arm64: Ensure FFA ranges are page aligned Sebastian Ene
2026-06-18 17:09 ` Vincent Donnefort
2026-06-30 9:51 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-30 10:22 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-06-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: arm64: Zero out the stack initialized data in the FFA handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-17 15:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-18 17:14 ` Vincent Donnefort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617152902.0C7731F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox