From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Ene" <sebastianene@google.com>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in host handler
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:05:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623120557.24A8D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623115354.632361-5-sebastianene@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND incorrectly treats the Notification ID bitmap parameter (W2) as a reserved field and requires it to be 0, preventing the host from unbinding notifications and causing a firmware resource leak.
--
commit 33f494c35955148d0babe5e028baf1876db19208
Author: Sebastian Ene <sebastianene@google.com>
KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND in host handler
This commit adds support for the FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND interface in the
host handler, verifying arguments before forwarding the message to TrustZone.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/ffa.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -957,6 +956,27 @@ static void do_ffa_notif_bind(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
> hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
> }
>
> +static void do_ffa_notif_unbind(struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *res,
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
> + DECLARE_REG(u32, endp_id, ctxt, 1);
> + DECLARE_REG(u32, reserved, ctxt, 2);
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *args;
> +
> + if (ffa_check_unused_args_sbz(ctxt, 5) || reserved) {
> + ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this reject valid unbind requests by forcing W2 to be zero?
It looks like W2 is extracted as reserved and required to be 0 here. However,
the FF-A specification uses W2 to pass the Notification ID bitmap for the
FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND call.
If the host attempts to unbind a notification with a non-zero bitmap, this
check will reject the call with FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS. Could this
prevent the host from successfully unbinding notifications, potentially
causing a notification tracking resource leak in the secure monitor over time?
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(FFA_NOTIF_RECEIVER_ENDP_MASK, endp_id) != HOST_FFA_ID) {
> + ffa_to_smccc_res(res, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + args = (void *)&ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> + hyp_smccc_1_2_smc(args, res);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623115354.632361-1-sebastianene@google.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 11:53 [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION* calls to TrustZone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] KVM: arm64: Enforce strict SBZ checks in the FF-A proxy Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 13:16 ` Will Deacon
2026-06-26 7:48 ` Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] KVM: arm64: Forward FFA_NOTIFICATION_BITMAP calls to Trustzone Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND in host handler Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 11:53 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: arm64: Support FFA_NOTIFICATION_INFO_GET " Sebastian Ene
2026-06-23 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623120557.24A8D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox